Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPSCX vs SSGSX
BPSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts BPSCX vs SSGSX
Boston Partners Small Cap Value II I
Price$26.36
Change-$0.05 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets651.81M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
BPSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPSCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. BPSCX (652M). BPSCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: BPSCX (0.53) vs SSGSX (0.47). BPSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: BPSCX (27 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). BPSCX (1.30) and SSGSX (1.26) have similar cost to investors . BPSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). BPSCX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BPSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.12 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). BPSCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.01 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| BPSCX | SSGSX | BPSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.26 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.26 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.746 | 2.046 | 427% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 652M | 5.64B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.47 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.12 | -1.56 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.43 | 3.97 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.01 | 22.95 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.84 | 24.71 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement