Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPRRX vs NLSCX
BPRRX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPRRX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Rsrch I
Price$14.43
Change-$0.18 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets563.13M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.84
Change-$0.08 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.07B
BPRRX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPRRX vs. NLSCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPRRX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.07B vs. BPRRX (563M). BPRRX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPRRX (0.60) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPRRX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPRRX (15 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than BPRRX (2.15). BPRRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPRRX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPRRX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.07 vs. BPRRX (-0.84). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.58 vs. BPRRX (11.49).
| BPRRX | NLSCX | BPRRX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 2.43 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 2.43 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.344 | 6.953 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 563M | 8.07B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.84 | 7.07 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.94 | 19.29 | -31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.49 | 16.58 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.33 | 47.75 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers