Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPRRX vs NLSCX
BPRRX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPRRX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Rsrch I
Price$13.65
Change-$0.82 (-5.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets594.9M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
BPRRX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPRRX vs. NLSCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPRRX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. BPRRX (595M). BPRRX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPRRX (0.99) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPRRX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPRRX (15 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than BPRRX (2.09). BPRRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. NLSCX (0.96). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPRRX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPRRX (2500). BPRRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.35 vs. NLSCX (2.65). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.66 vs. BPRRX (1.19).
| BPRRX | NLSCX | BPRRX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 2.43 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 2.43 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.709 | -0.693 | -391% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 595M | 8.16B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.35 | 2.65 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.64 | 22.54 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.19 | 14.66 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.92 | 52.68 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers