Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPRRX vs NLSAX
BPRRX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts BPRRX vs NLSAX
Boston Partners Long/Short Rsrch I
Price$13.88
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets535.12M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.55
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.6B
BPRRX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPRRX vs. NLSAX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPRRX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.6B vs. BPRRX (535M). BPRRX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: BPRRX (0.63) vs NLSAX (0.00). BPRRX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: BPRRX (15 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). BPRRX (2.15) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). BPRRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPRRX: NLSAX (1000) vs BPRRX (2500). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.97 vs. BPRRX (-1.26). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.38 vs. BPRRX (10.55).
| BPRRX | NLSAX | BPRRX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.68 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.68 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.680 | 5.905 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 535M | 7.6B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.26 | 8.97 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.43 | 14.89 | -50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.55 | 24.38 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.31 | 49.76 | -11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers