BPPPF
Price
$25.73
Change
-$0.47 (-1.79%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
8.14B
MSHXF
Price
$42.85
Change
+$8.84 (+25.99%)
Updated
May 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPPPF vs MSHXF

Header iconBPPPF vs MSHXF Comparison
Open Charts BPPPF vs MSHXFBanner chart's image
Bid
Price$25.73
Change-$0.47 (-1.79%)
Volume$286
Capitalization8.14B
Mitsubishi Shokuhin
Price$42.85
Change+$8.84 (+25.99%)
Volume$5.4K
Capitalization1.16B
BPPPF vs MSHXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSHXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPPPF vs. MSHXF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPPPF is a Hold and MSHXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BPPPF: $25.73 vs. MSHXF: $42.85)
Brand notoriety: BPPPF and MSHXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPPPF: 6% vs. MSHXF: 147%
Market capitalization -- BPPPF: $8.14B vs. MSHXF: $1.16B
BPPPF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $8.14B. MSHXF’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $1.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $40.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPPPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSHXF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BPPPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSHXF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSHXF is a better buy in the long-term than BPPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPPPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSHXF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPPPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MSHXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSHXF is a better buy in the short-term than BPPPF.

Price Growth

BPPPF (@Food Distributors) experienced а -1.80% price change this week, while MSHXF (@Food Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was +3.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (+3.10% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPPPF($8.14B) has a higher market cap than MSHXF($1.17B). BPPPF has higher P/E ratio than MSHXF: BPPPF (19.89) vs MSHXF (8.72). MSHXF YTD gains are higher at: 32.253 vs. BPPPF (9.812). MSHXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.1B vs. BPPPF (14.6B). BPPPF has more cash in the bank: 8.09B vs. MSHXF (583M). MSHXF has less debt than BPPPF: MSHXF (6.6B) vs BPPPF (21.6B). MSHXF has higher revenues than BPPPF: MSHXF (1.95T) vs BPPPF (218B).
BPPPFMSHXFBPPPF / MSHXF
Capitalization8.14B1.17B698%
EBITDA14.6B25.1B58%
Gain YTD9.81232.25330%
P/E Ratio19.898.72228%
Revenue218B1.95T11%
Total Cash8.09B583M1,388%
Total Debt21.6B6.6B328%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPPPF vs MSHXF: Fundamental Ratings
BPPPF
MSHXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2318
SMR RATING
1..100
9943
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4625
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSHXF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as BPPPF (34). This means that MSHXF’s stock grew similarly to BPPPF’s over the last 12 months.

MSHXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as BPPPF (23). This means that MSHXF’s stock grew similarly to BPPPF’s over the last 12 months.

MSHXF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPPPF (99). This means that MSHXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPPPF’s over the last 12 months.

MSHXF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BPPPF (50). This means that MSHXF’s stock grew similarly to BPPPF’s over the last 12 months.

MSHXF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as BPPPF (46). This means that MSHXF’s stock grew similarly to BPPPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPPPFMSHXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
6%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSHXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGRTX47.030.55
+1.18%
MFS International Growth R3
SAUMX29.330.08
+0.27%
SA US Small Company
YAFIX20.030.02
+0.10%
AMG Yacktman Focused I
AOFIX19.16-0.01
-0.05%
Alger Small Cap Focus I
HISFX14.61-0.02
-0.14%
Hennessy Small Cap Financial Instl

BPPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPPPF and MSHXF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPPPF and MSHXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPPPF
1D Price
Change %
BPPPF100%
N/A
MSHXF - BPPPF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COLFF - BPPPF
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.24%
HFFG - BPPPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.88%
BZLFY - BPPPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
AIXN - BPPPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MSHXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSHXF and BPPPF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSHXF and BPPPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSHXF
1D Price
Change %
MSHXF100%
N/A
BPPPF - MSHXF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JRONY - MSHXF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
MTTWF - MSHXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OGOFF - MSHXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KARNF - MSHXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More