BPPPF
Price
$25.17
Change
+$0.08 (+0.32%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
8.68B
MSHXF
Price
$42.85
Change
+$8.84 (+25.99%)
Updated
May 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.86B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPPPF vs MSHXF

Header iconBPPPF vs MSHXF Comparison
Open Charts BPPPF vs MSHXFBanner chart's image
Bid
Price$25.17
Change+$0.08 (+0.32%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization8.68B
Mitsubishi Shokuhin
Price$42.85
Change+$8.84 (+25.99%)
Volume$5.4K
Capitalization1.86B
BPPPF vs MSHXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPPPF vs. MSHXF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPPPF is a Hold and MSHXF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (BPPPF: $25.17 vs. MSHXF: $42.85)
Brand notoriety: BPPPF and MSHXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPPPF: 44% vs. MSHXF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BPPPF: $8.68B vs. MSHXF: $1.86B
BPPPF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $8.68B. MSHXF’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $1.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $38.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $4.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPPPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSHXF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BPPPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSHXF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSHXF is a better buy in the long-term than BPPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPPPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BPPPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BPPPF (@Food Distributors) experienced а +1.53% price change this week, while MSHXF (@Food Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-1.00% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPPPF($8.68B) has a higher market cap than MSHXF($1.86B). BPPPF has higher P/E ratio than MSHXF: BPPPF (18.97) vs MSHXF (11.81). MSHXF YTD gains are higher at: 32.253 vs. BPPPF (7.423). MSHXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 45.3B vs. BPPPF (15.9B). BPPPF has more cash in the bank: 7.55B vs. MSHXF (367M). MSHXF has higher revenues than BPPPF: MSHXF (2.09T) vs BPPPF (230B).
BPPPFMSHXFBPPPF / MSHXF
Capitalization8.68B1.86B467%
EBITDA15.9B45.3B35%
Gain YTD7.42332.25323%
P/E Ratio18.9711.81161%
Revenue230B2.09T11%
Total Cash7.55B367M2,058%
Total Debt23BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPPPF vs MSHXF: Fundamental Ratings
BPPPF
MSHXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3820
SMR RATING
1..100
9950
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5625
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSHXF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as BPPPF (32). This means that MSHXF’s stock grew similarly to BPPPF’s over the last 12 months.

MSHXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as BPPPF (38). This means that MSHXF’s stock grew similarly to BPPPF’s over the last 12 months.

MSHXF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPPPF (99). This means that MSHXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPPPF’s over the last 12 months.

MSHXF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as BPPPF (53). This means that MSHXF’s stock grew similarly to BPPPF’s over the last 12 months.

MSHXF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as BPPPF (56). This means that MSHXF’s stock grew similarly to BPPPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPPPFMSHXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQH71.801.06
+1.50%
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
YCS43.990.53
+1.22%
ProShares UltraShort Yen
HAP53.360.33
+0.63%
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
DUHP36.340.20
+0.55%
Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
EMCS31.45-0.10
-0.31%
Xtrackers MSCI EMs Climate Selection ETF

BPPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPPPF and MSHXF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPPPF and MSHXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPPPF
1D Price
Change %
BPPPF100%
N/A
MSHXF - BPPPF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COLFF - BPPPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFFG - BPPPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
BZLFY - BPPPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
AIXN - BPPPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MSHXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSHXF and BPPPF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSHXF and BPPPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSHXF
1D Price
Change %
MSHXF100%
N/A
BPPPF - MSHXF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JRONY - MSHXF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
MTTWF - MSHXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OGOFF - MSHXF
0%
Poorly correlated
-13.98%
KARNF - MSHXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More