BPPPF
Price
$25.10
Change
-$0.95 (-3.65%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
8.37B
HFFG
Price
$2.77
Change
-$0.61 (-18.05%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
185.94M
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPPPF vs HFFG

Header iconBPPPF vs HFFG Comparison
Open Charts BPPPF vs HFFGBanner chart's image
Bid
Price$25.10
Change-$0.95 (-3.65%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.37B
HF Foods Group
Price$2.77
Change-$0.61 (-18.05%)
Volume$1.68K
Capitalization185.94M
BPPPF vs HFFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPPPF vs. HFFG commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPPPF is a Hold and HFFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BPPPF: $25.10 vs. HFFG: $3.38)
Brand notoriety: BPPPF and HFFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPPPF: 16% vs. HFFG: 75%
Market capitalization -- BPPPF: $8.37B vs. HFFG: $185.94M
BPPPF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $8.37B. HFFG’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $185.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $8703.84T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $263.76T.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPPPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHFFG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BPPPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HFFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPPPF is a better buy in the long-term than HFFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPPPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HFFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPPPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HFFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HFFG is a better buy in the short-term than BPPPF.

Price Growth

BPPPF (@Food Distributors) experienced а -3.64% price change this week, while HFFG (@Food Distributors) price change was -1.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

HFFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-2.32% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPPPF($8.37B) has a higher market cap than HFFG($186M). HFFG has higher P/E ratio than BPPPF: HFFG (43.25) vs BPPPF (17.85). BPPPF YTD gains are higher at: 7.135 vs. HFFG (5.296). BPPPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.2B vs. HFFG (-10.33M). BPPPF has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. HFFG (15.6M). HFFG has less debt than BPPPF: HFFG (237M) vs BPPPF (26.2B). BPPPF has higher revenues than HFFG: BPPPF (236B) vs HFFG (1.22B).
BPPPFHFFGBPPPF / HFFG
Capitalization8.37B186M4,501%
EBITDA16.2B-10.33M-156,764%
Gain YTD7.1355.296135%
P/E Ratio17.8543.2541%
Revenue236B1.22B19,392%
Total Cash11.8B15.6M75,641%
Total Debt26.2B237M11,055%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPPPF vs HFFG: Fundamental Ratings
BPPPF
HFFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
982
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41100
SMR RATING
1..100
9996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4968
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPPPF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFFG (65) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that BPPPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFFG’s over the last 12 months.

BPPPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFFG (100) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that BPPPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFFG’s over the last 12 months.

HFFG's SMR Rating (96) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as BPPPF (99) in the null industry. This means that HFFG’s stock grew similarly to BPPPF’s over the last 12 months.

HFFG's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as BPPPF (60) in the null industry. This means that HFFG’s stock grew similarly to BPPPF’s over the last 12 months.

BPPPF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as HFFG (68) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that BPPPF’s stock grew similarly to HFFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPPPFHFFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MHD11.690.05
+0.43%
Blackrock Muniholdings Fund
AVGB51.27N/A
N/A
Avantis Credit ETF
SCHR25.09-0.04
-0.16%
Schwab Intermediate-Term US Trs ETF™
KAPR34.05-0.06
-0.18%
Innovator Russell 2000 Pwr Bffr ETF Apr
XB39.71-0.10
-0.25%
BondBloxx B Rated USD Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF

BPPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPPPF and MSHXF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPPPF and MSHXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPPPF
1D Price
Change %
BPPPF100%
N/A
MSHXF - BPPPF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COLFF - BPPPF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
HFFG - BPPPF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
BZLFY - BPPPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
AIXN - BPPPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HFFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HFFG and SPTN have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HFFG and SPTN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFFG
1D Price
Change %
HFFG100%
-0.29%
SPTN - HFFG
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNFI - HFFG
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
PFGC - HFFG
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
ANDE - HFFG
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
CHEF - HFFG
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
More