BPPPF vs BZLFY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPPPF is a Hold and BZLFY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BPPPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBZLFY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BPPPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- BZLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
BPPPF (@Food Distributors) experienced а +7.07% price change this week, while BZLFY (@Food Distributors) price change was -2.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.39%.
Reported Earning Dates
BZLFY is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food Distributors (-0.54% weekly)Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.
| BPPPF | BZLFY | BPPPF / BZLFY | |
| Capitalization | 8.14B | 12.5B | 65% |
| EBITDA | 14.6B | 1.04B | 1,411% |
| Gain YTD | 11.857 | 10.664 | 111% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.89 | 20.20 | 98% |
| Revenue | 218B | 12B | 1,817% |
| Total Cash | 8.09B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 21.6B | N/A | - |
BPPPF | BZLFY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BPPPF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLFY (55). This means that BPPPF’s stock grew similarly to BZLFY’s over the last 12 months.
BZLFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPPPF (78). This means that BZLFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPPPF’s over the last 12 months.
BZLFY's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as BPPPF (99). This means that BZLFY’s stock grew similarly to BPPPF’s over the last 12 months.
BZLFY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BPPPF (51). This means that BZLFY’s stock grew similarly to BPPPF’s over the last 12 months.
BZLFY's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPPPF (78). This means that BZLFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPPPF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
BPPPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BPPPF and MSHXF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPPPF and MSHXF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BPPPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPPPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MSHXF - BPPPF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| COLFF - BPPPF | 8% Poorly correlated | -11.69% | ||
| HFFG - BPPPF | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
| BZLFY - BPPPF | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.97% | ||
| AIXN - BPPPF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
BZLFY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BZLFY and HFFG have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZLFY and HFFG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BZLFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BZLFY | 100% | -1.97% | ||
| HFFG - BZLFY | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
| PFGC - BZLFY | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| COLFF - BZLFY | 10% Poorly correlated | -11.69% | ||
| BZLFF - BZLFY | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| USFD - BZLFY | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.26% | ||
More | ||||