Advertisement
BPOSF vs CGJTF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPOSF is a Hold and CGJTF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BPOSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCGJTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BPOSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CGJTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CGJTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CGJTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BPOSF (@Other Transportation) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CGJTF (@Other Transportation) price change was +3.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Transportation industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.63%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Transportation (+1.88% weekly)Other Transportation includes transportation services like providing airport ground transportation, airport management and equipment, shipping services, as well as businesses that operate bridges, expressways and other public services such as taxis and subways. Grupo Aero-pac, Corporacion America Airports S.A. and Matson, Inc. are some of the major companies operating in this space.
| BPOSF | CGJTF | BPOSF / CGJTF | |
| Capitalization | 567M | 1.1B | 51% |
| EBITDA | 547M | 390M | 140% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -3.911 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 8.35 | 11.02 | 76% |
| Revenue | 4.45B | 1.02B | 436% |
| Total Cash | 781M | 7.4M | 10,554% |
| Total Debt | 2.56B | 840M | 305% |
BPOSF | CGJTF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 51 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 21 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BPOSF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGJTF (51). This means that BPOSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGJTF’s over the last 12 months.
BPOSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CGJTF (100). This means that BPOSF’s stock grew similarly to CGJTF’s over the last 12 months.
CGJTF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPOSF (96). This means that CGJTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPOSF’s over the last 12 months.
CGJTF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as BPOSF (71). This means that CGJTF’s stock grew similarly to BPOSF’s over the last 12 months.
BPOSF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CGJTF (100). This means that BPOSF’s stock grew significantly faster than CGJTF’s over the last 12 months.
| BPOSF | CGJTF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 5% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 5% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
BPOSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BPOSF and CGJTF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPOSF and CGJTF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BPOSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPOSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CGJTF - BPOSF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.96% | ||
| BPOSY - BPOSF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ATXG - BPOSF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| CSCMY - BPOSF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FWRD - BPOSF | 0% Poorly correlated | -5.55% | ||
More | ||||
CGJTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGJTF and FDX have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGJTF and FDX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGJTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGJTF | 100% | +0.96% | ||
| FDX - CGJTF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.51% | ||
| ATXG - CGJTF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| FWRD - CGJTF | 4% Poorly correlated | -5.55% | ||
| BPOSF - CGJTF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ZTO - CGJTF | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.94% | ||
More | ||||