Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPLSX vs NLSIX
BPLSX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts BPLSX vs NLSIX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Instl
Price$14.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.32M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.05
Change+$0.04 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.53B
BPLSX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPLSX vs. NLSIX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPLSX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.53B vs. BPLSX (81.3M). BPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: BPLSX (0.49) vs NLSIX (0.02). BPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: BPLSX (27 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). BPLSX (2.72) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BPLSX (35.00). BPLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: BPLSX (100000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.92 vs. BPLSX (0.00). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 25.91 vs. BPLSX (-1.41).
| BPLSX | NLSIX | BPLSX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 1.32 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 1.32 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.935 | 6.613 | 301% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.3M | 7.53B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.02 | 2,386% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.00 | 9.92 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.84 | 20.68 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.41 | 25.91 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.47 | 60.50 | -34% |