Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPLSX vs NLSCX
BPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPLSX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Instl
Price$14.68
Change+$0.14 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.51M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
BPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPLSX vs. NLSCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPLSX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. BPLSX (101M). BPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPLSX (0.08) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPLSX (27 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). BPLSX (2.63) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). BPLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. NLSCX (0.96). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPLSX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPLSX (100000). BPLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.42 vs. NLSCX (2.65). BPLSX return over 5 years is better than : 33.58 vs. NLSCX (14.66).
| BPLSX | NLSCX | BPLSX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 2.43 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.63 | 2.43 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.963 | -0.693 | -139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 8.16B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.42 | 2.65 | 583% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.81 | 22.54 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.58 | 14.66 | 229% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.28 | 52.68 | -35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement