Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPLSX vs NLSCX
BPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPLSX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Instl
Price$14.55
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.68M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.77
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
BPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPLSX vs. NLSCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPLSX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.96B vs. BPLSX (97.7M). BPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPLSX (0.47) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPLSX (27 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). BPLSX (2.72) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). BPLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPLSX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPLSX (100000). BPLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.81 vs. NLSCX (5.16). BPLSX return over 5 years is better than : 29.41 vs. NLSCX (16.45).
| BPLSX | NLSCX | BPLSX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 2.43 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 2.43 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.873 | 6.049 | 312% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.7M | 7.96B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.81 | 5.16 | 345% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.15 | 25.44 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.41 | 16.45 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.14 | 45.89 | -37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement