Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPLSX vs NLSCX
BPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPLSX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Instl
Price$14.96
Change-$0.12 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.73M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.84
Change-$0.08 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.07B
BPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPLSX vs. NLSCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPLSX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.07B vs. BPLSX (91.7M). BPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPLSX (0.48) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPLSX (27 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). BPLSX (2.72) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BPLSX (35.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPLSX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPLSX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.56 vs. BPLSX (-3.14). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.09 vs. BPLSX (-5.43).
| BPLSX | NLSCX | BPLSX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 2.43 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 2.43 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.222 | 6.501 | 342% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.7M | 8.07B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.14 | 6.56 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.58 | 19.01 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.43 | 16.09 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.65 | 46.51 | -51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement