Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPLSX vs NLSAX
BPLSX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts BPLSX vs NLSAX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Instl
Price$14.63
Change+$0.08 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.68M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.74
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
BPLSX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPLSX vs. NLSAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPLSX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.96B vs. BPLSX (97.7M). BPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: BPLSX (0.47) vs NLSAX (0.00). BPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: BPLSX (27 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). BPLSX (2.72) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). BPLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPLSX: NLSAX (1000) vs BPLSX (100000). BPLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.85 vs. NLSAX (6.02). BPLSX return over 5 years is better than : 30.12 vs. NLSAX (21.23).
| BPLSX | NLSAX | BPLSX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 1.68 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 1.68 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.526 | 6.934 | 282% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.7M | 7.96B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.85 | 6.02 | 313% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.12 | 28.66 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.12 | 21.23 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.55 | 57.45 | -29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement