Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPLEX vs NLSCX
BPLEX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPLEX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity I
Price$11.40
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.13M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.83
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
BPLEX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPLEX vs. NLSCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPLEX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8B vs. BPLEX (93.1M). BPLEX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPLEX (0.40) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPLEX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPLEX (27 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). BPLEX (2.97) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BPLEX (35.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPLEX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPLEX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. BPLEX (-7.26). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.78 vs. BPLEX (13.98).
| BPLEX | NLSCX | BPLEX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 2.43 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.97 | 2.43 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.590 | 6.614 | 372% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.1M | 8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.26 | 6.13 | -118% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.86 | 17.00 | -82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.98 | 15.78 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.98 | 45.22 | -82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers