Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPLEX vs NLSCX
BPLEX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPLEX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity I
Price$10.55
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.68M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.76
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
BPLEX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPLEX vs. NLSCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPLEX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.96B vs. BPLEX (97.7M). BPLEX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPLEX (0.40) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPLEX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPLEX (27 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). BPLEX (2.97) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). BPLEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPLEX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPLEX (2500). BPLEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.30 vs. NLSCX (5.16). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.45 vs. BPLEX (9.00).
| BPLEX | NLSCX | BPLEX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 2.43 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.97 | 2.43 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.301 | 6.049 | 253% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.7M | 7.96B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.30 | 5.16 | 277% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.36 | 25.44 | -29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.00 | 16.45 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.13 | 45.89 | -77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement