Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPLEX vs NLSAX
BPLEX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts BPLEX vs NLSAX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity I
Price$10.64
Change-$0.21 (-1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.51M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.60
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
BPLEX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPLEX vs. NLSAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPLEX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. BPLEX (101M). BPLEX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: BPLEX (0.11) vs NLSAX (0.00). BPLEX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: BPLEX (27 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). BPLEX (2.88) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). BPLEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. NLSAX (0.96). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPLEX: NLSAX (1000) vs BPLEX (2500). BPLEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.01 vs. NLSAX (3.43). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.35 vs. BPLEX (12.55).
| BPLEX | NLSAX | BPLEX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 1.68 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.88 | 1.68 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.949 | -0.609 | -156% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 8.16B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.01 | 3.43 | 350% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.11 | 25.30 | -44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.55 | 19.35 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.03 | 64.99 | -55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement