Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPIRX vs NLSCX
BPIRX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPIRX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Rsrch Instl
Price$14.32
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets579.08M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.72
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
BPIRX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPIRX vs. NLSCX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPIRX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.99B vs. BPIRX (579M). BPIRX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPIRX (0.96) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPIRX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPIRX (15 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than BPIRX (1.90). BPIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPIRX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPIRX (100000). NLSCX (5.64) and BPIRX (5.60) have marching annual gain over last year. NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 17.08 vs. BPIRX (1.77).
| BPIRX | NLSCX | BPIRX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 2.43 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 2.43 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.994 | -0.160 | -1,246% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 579M | 7.99B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.60 | 5.64 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.77 | 23.52 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.77 | 17.08 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.34 | 52.97 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers