Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPIRX vs NLSCX
BPIRX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPIRX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Rsrch Instl
Price$14.89
Change+$0.09 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets543.43M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.74
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.53B
BPIRX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPIRX vs. NLSCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPIRX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.53B vs. BPIRX (543M). BPIRX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPIRX (0.73) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPIRX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPIRX (15 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than BPIRX (1.90). BPIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPIRX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPIRX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.71 vs. BPIRX (0.91). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.71 vs. BPIRX (16.62).
| BPIRX | NLSCX | BPIRX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 2.43 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 2.43 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.363 | 5.822 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 543M | 7.53B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.91 | 8.71 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.61 | 16.42 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.62 | 18.71 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.51 | 43.08 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers