Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPIRX vs NLSCX
BPIRX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPIRX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Rsrch Instl
Price$14.22
Change-$0.07 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets525.16M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.07
Change-$0.12 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.32B
BPIRX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPIRX vs. NLSCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPIRX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.32B vs. BPIRX (525M). BPIRX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPIRX (0.76) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPIRX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPIRX (15 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than BPIRX (1.90). BPIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPIRX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPIRX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.23 vs. BPIRX (-0.07). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.58 vs. BPIRX (13.27).
| BPIRX | NLSCX | BPIRX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 2.43 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 2.43 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.255 | 2.148 | 245% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 525M | 7.32B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.07 | 6.23 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.00 | 15.61 | -58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.27 | 22.58 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.54 | 32.27 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement