Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPIRX vs NLSCX
BPIRX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPIRX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Rsrch Instl
Price$14.08
Change-$1.58 (-10.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets568.91M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.70
Change-$0.06 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.94B
BPIRX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPIRX vs. NLSCX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPIRX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.94B vs. BPIRX (569M). BPIRX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPIRX (0.70) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPIRX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPIRX (15 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than BPIRX (1.90). BPIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPIRX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPIRX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.80 vs. BPIRX (2.34). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.10 vs. BPIRX (13.30).
| BPIRX | NLSCX | BPIRX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 2.43 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 2.43 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.914 | 6.049 | 263% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 569M | 7.94B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.34 | 4.80 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.31 | 16.89 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.30 | 15.10 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.30 | 47.99 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers