Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPIRX vs NLSCX
BPIRX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPIRX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Rsrch Instl
Price$15.17
Change-$0.18 (-1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets563.13M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.84
Change-$0.08 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.07B
BPIRX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPIRX vs. NLSCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPIRX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.07B vs. BPIRX (563M). BPIRX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPIRX (0.71) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPIRX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPIRX (15 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than BPIRX (1.90). BPIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPIRX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPIRX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.56 vs. BPIRX (-1.18). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.09 vs. BPIRX (13.46).
| BPIRX | NLSCX | BPIRX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 2.43 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 2.43 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.287 | 6.501 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 563M | 8.07B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.18 | 6.56 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.62 | 19.01 | -24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.46 | 16.09 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.94 | 46.51 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers