BPIRF
Price
$8.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
10.58B
BQCNF
Price
$118.46
Change
+$8.46 (+7.69%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
9.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPIRF vs BQCNF

Header iconBPIRF vs BQCNF Comparison
Open Charts BPIRF vs BQCNFBanner chart's image
Piraeus Financial Holdings S.A
Price$8.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$212
Capitalization10.58B
Banque Cantonale Vaudoise
Price$118.46
Change+$8.46 (+7.69%)
Volume$300
Capitalization9.88B
BPIRF vs BQCNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPIRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BQCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPIRF vs. BQCNF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPIRF is a Hold and BQCNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BPIRF: $8.00 vs. BQCNF: $118.46)
Brand notoriety: BPIRF and BQCNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPIRF: 114% vs. BQCNF: 176%
Market capitalization -- BPIRF: $10.58B vs. BQCNF: $9.88B
BPIRF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.58B. BQCNF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPIRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBQCNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPIRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BQCNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPIRF is a better buy in the long-term than BQCNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPIRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BQCNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPIRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • BQCNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BPIRF and BQCNF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BPIRF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BQCNF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.69% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPIRF($10.6B) has a higher market cap than BQCNF($9.88B). BQCNF has higher P/E ratio than BPIRF: BQCNF (18.59) vs BPIRF (7.94). BPIRF YTD gains are higher at: 103.822 vs. BQCNF (-15.386). BPIRF has less debt than BQCNF: BPIRF (4.92B) vs BQCNF (9.45B). BPIRF has higher revenues than BQCNF: BPIRF (2.7B) vs BQCNF (1.15B).
BPIRFBQCNFBPIRF / BQCNF
Capitalization10.6B9.88B107%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD103.822-15.386-675%
P/E Ratio7.9418.5943%
Revenue2.7B1.15B235%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt4.92B9.45B52%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPIRF vs BQCNF: Fundamental Ratings
BPIRF
BQCNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10058
SMR RATING
1..100
1016
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3859
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1154
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPIRF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BQCNF (84). This means that BPIRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

BQCNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPIRF (100). This means that BQCNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPIRF’s over the last 12 months.

BPIRF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as BQCNF (16). This means that BPIRF’s stock grew similarly to BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

BPIRF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as BQCNF (59). This means that BPIRF’s stock grew similarly to BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

BPIRF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BQCNF (54). This means that BPIRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPIRFBQCNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
12%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPIRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BQCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSID66.010.35
+0.54%
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Intl Eq ETF
VEU69.530.31
+0.45%
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US ETF
PPEM25.480.01
+0.04%
Putnam PanAgora ESG Emerg Mkts Eq ETF
DHSB25.59N/A
N/A
Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF
SDOW39.47-0.04
-0.10%
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

BPIRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPIRF has been loosely correlated with RGNLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPIRF jumps, then RGNLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPIRF
1D Price
Change %
BPIRF100%
N/A
RGNLF - BPIRF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMTDF - BPIRF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBNC - BPIRF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JTNB - BPIRF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTFF - BPIRF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BQCNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BQCNF has been loosely correlated with MFGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BQCNF jumps, then MFGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BQCNF
1D Price
Change %
BQCNF100%
N/A
MFGI - BQCNF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VBNK - BQCNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
BPIRF - BQCNF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BORT - BQCNF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPHLF - BQCNF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More