BPHLF
Price
$1.90
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
UNCFF
Price
$44.18
Change
+$1.52 (+3.56%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

BPHLF vs UNCFF

Header iconBPHLF vs UNCFF Comparison
Open Charts BPHLF vs UNCFFBanner chart's image
Bank of the Philippine Islands
Price$1.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.06K
CapitalizationN/A
UniCredito Spa
Price$44.18
Change+$1.52 (+3.56%)
Volume$417
CapitalizationN/A
BPHLF vs UNCFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPHLF vs. UNCFF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPHLF is a Hold and UNCFF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (BPHLF: $1.90 vs. UNCFF: $44.18)
Brand notoriety: BPHLF and UNCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPHLF: 100% vs. UNCFF: 20%
Market capitalization -- BPHLF: $10.31B vs. UNCFF: $45.77B
BPHLF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.31B. UNCFF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $45.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPHLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNCFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UNCFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNCFF is a better buy in the long-term than BPHLF.

Price Growth

BPHLF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UNCFF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.80% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNCFF($45.8B) has a higher market cap than BPHLF($10.3B). BPHLF has higher P/E ratio than UNCFF: BPHLF (11.57) vs UNCFF (5.29). UNCFF YTD gains are higher at: 60.470 vs. BPHLF (0.582). UNCFF has less debt than BPHLF: UNCFF (93B) vs BPHLF (99.7B). BPHLF has higher revenues than UNCFF: BPHLF (125B) vs UNCFF (23.1B).
BPHLFUNCFFBPHLF / UNCFF
Capitalization10.3B45.8B22%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.58260.4701%
P/E Ratio11.575.29219%
Revenue125B23.1B541%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt99.7B93B107%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPHLF vs UNCFF: Fundamental Ratings
BPHLF
UNCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4784
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
576
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5746
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8761
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPHLF's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as UNCFF (93). This means that BPHLF’s stock grew similarly to UNCFF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPHLF (57). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

BPHLF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as UNCFF (4). This means that BPHLF’s stock grew similarly to UNCFF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BPHLF (57). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to BPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as BPHLF (87). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to BPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

BPHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPHLF has been loosely correlated with KGTFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPHLF jumps, then KGTFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPHLF
1D Price
Change %
BPHLF100%
N/A
KGTFY - BPHLF
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PONT - BPHLF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HRGG - BPHLF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BGKKF - BPHLF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MIFF - BPHLF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

UNCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNCFF has been loosely correlated with ISNPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNCFF jumps, then ISNPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNCFF
1D Price
Change %
UNCFF100%
+3.55%
ISNPY - UNCFF
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
CRZBY - UNCFF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
MDIBY - UNCFF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
BKRIF - UNCFF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
BPHLF - UNCFF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More