BPHLF
Price
$1.85
Change
-$0.26 (-12.32%)
Updated
Mar 18 closing price
Capitalization
10.31B
SMAL
Price
$50.00
Change
+$2.69 (+5.69%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
9.75M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPHLF vs SMAL

Header iconBPHLF vs SMAL Comparison
Open Charts BPHLF vs SMALBanner chart's image
Bank of the Philippine Islands
Price$1.85
Change-$0.26 (-12.32%)
Volume$150
Capitalization10.31B
Summit Bancshares
Price$50.00
Change+$2.69 (+5.69%)
Volume$300
Capitalization9.75M
BPHLF vs SMAL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPHLF vs. SMAL commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPHLF is a Buy and SMAL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BPHLF: $1.85 vs. SMAL: $50.00)
Brand notoriety: BPHLF and SMAL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPHLF: 100% vs. SMAL: 72%
Market capitalization -- BPHLF: $10.31B vs. SMAL: $9.75M
BPHLF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.31B. SMAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPHLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMAL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPHLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BPHLF and SMAL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMAL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMAL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BPHLF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SMAL (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPHLF($10.3B) has a higher market cap than SMAL($9.75M). SMAL YTD gains are higher at: 14.062 vs. BPHLF (-17.778). SMAL has less debt than BPHLF: SMAL (3M) vs BPHLF (99.7B). BPHLF has higher revenues than SMAL: BPHLF (125B) vs SMAL (8.15M).
BPHLFSMALBPHLF / SMAL
Capitalization10.3B9.75M105,630%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-17.77814.062-126%
P/E Ratio11.57N/A-
Revenue125B8.15M1,534,684%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt99.7B3M3,323,333%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPHLF vs SMAL: Fundamental Ratings
BPHLF
SMAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
337
SMR RATING
1..100
180
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7370
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a21

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMAL's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as BPHLF (70). This means that SMAL’s stock grew similarly to BPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BPHLF (33). This means that SMAL’s stock grew similarly to BPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

BPHLF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMAL (80). This means that BPHLF’s stock grew significantly faster than SMAL’s over the last 12 months.

SMAL's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as BPHLF (76). This means that SMAL’s stock grew similarly to BPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAL's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as BPHLF (73). This means that SMAL’s stock grew similarly to BPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPHLFSMAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSHI13.81N/A
N/A
Boss Holdings, Inc.
LGNC221.00N/A
N/A
Logan Clay Products Co.
CCARF1.00N/A
N/A
Colonial Coal International Corp
JDDSF1.29N/A
N/A
JD Sports Fashion PLC
ZEOOY9.73N/A
N/A
Zeon Corp.

BPHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPHLF has been loosely correlated with KGTFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPHLF jumps, then KGTFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPHLF
1D Price
Change %
BPHLF100%
N/A
KGTFY - BPHLF
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PONT - BPHLF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HRGG - BPHLF
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.57%
BGKKF - BPHLF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MIFF - BPHLF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

SMAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMAL and BMDPF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMAL and BMDPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMAL
1D Price
Change %
SMAL100%
N/A
BMDPF - SMAL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHMG - SMAL
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
BPHLF - SMAL
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUTNY - SMAL
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
STBI - SMAL
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
More