BPHLF
Price
$1.62
Change
-$0.23 (-12.43%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
11.05B
SLRK
Price
$8.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
38.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPHLF vs SLRK

Header iconBPHLF vs SLRK Comparison
Open Charts BPHLF vs SLRKBanner chart's image
Bank of the Philippine Islands
Price$1.62
Change-$0.23 (-12.43%)
Volume$762
Capitalization11.05B
Solera National Ban
Price$8.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.43K
Capitalization38.05M
BPHLF vs SLRK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPHLF vs. SLRK commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPHLF is a Hold and SLRK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BPHLF: $1.62 vs. SLRK: $8.85)
Brand notoriety: BPHLF and SLRK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPHLF: 297% vs. SLRK: 37%
Market capitalization -- BPHLF: $11.05B vs. SLRK: $38.05M
BPHLF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.05B. SLRK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $38.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPHLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLRK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLRK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLRK is a better buy in the long-term than BPHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPHLF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLRK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPHLF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLRK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLRK is a better buy in the short-term than BPHLF.

Price Growth

BPHLF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SLRK (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPHLF($11.1B) has a higher market cap than SLRK($38.1M). BPHLF has higher P/E ratio than SLRK: BPHLF (7.51) vs SLRK (2.11). SLRK YTD gains are higher at: -6.646 vs. BPHLF (-28.000).
BPHLFSLRKBPHLF / SLRK
Capitalization11.1B38.1M29,134%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-28.000-6.646421%
P/E Ratio7.512.11356%
Revenue175BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt146BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPHLF vs SLRK: Fundamental Ratings
BPHLF
SLRK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5080
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66100
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8474
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7754
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLRK's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPHLF (58). This means that SLRK’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

BPHLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLRK (100). This means that BPHLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLRK’s over the last 12 months.

BPHLF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as SLRK (4). This means that BPHLF’s stock grew similarly to SLRK’s over the last 12 months.

SLRK's Price Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as BPHLF (84). This means that SLRK’s stock grew similarly to BPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

SLRK's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as BPHLF (77). This means that SLRK’s stock grew similarly to BPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPHLFSLRK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
34%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FPOCF0.180.01
+4.05%
FPX Nickel Corp.
MGDDF37.720.11
+0.30%
CIE GENERALE DES ETABLISSEMENTS MICHELIN SA CLERMONT-FERRAND
HACBY19.09N/A
N/A
Hachijuni Bank Ltd. (THE)
EXMRF13.50N/A
N/A
Exmar S.A.
STXPF0.09-0.01
-12.36%
STUHINI EXPL LTD.

BPHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPHLF has been loosely correlated with KGTFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPHLF jumps, then KGTFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPHLF
1D Price
Change %
BPHLF100%
N/A
KGTFY - BPHLF
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PONT - BPHLF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HRGG - BPHLF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
BGKKF - BPHLF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NWPP - BPHLF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
More

SLRK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLRK and MDIBY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLRK and MDIBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLRK
1D Price
Change %
SLRK100%
N/A
MDIBY - SLRK
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
KGTFY - SLRK
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRAF - SLRK
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
DBSDY - SLRK
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
BPHLF - SLRK
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More