BPHLF
Price
$1.85
Change
-$0.26 (-12.32%)
Updated
Mar 18 closing price
Capitalization
10.31B
FABP
Price
$40.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
78.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPHLF vs FABP

Header iconBPHLF vs FABP Comparison
Open Charts BPHLF vs FABPBanner chart's image
Bank of the Philippine Islands
Price$1.85
Change-$0.26 (-12.32%)
Volume$150
Capitalization10.31B
Farmers Ban
Price$40.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$800
Capitalization78.23M
BPHLF vs FABP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FABP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPHLF vs. FABP commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPHLF is a Buy and FABP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BPHLF: $1.85 vs. FABP: $40.00)
Brand notoriety: BPHLF and FABP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPHLF: 100% vs. FABP: 55%
Market capitalization -- BPHLF: $10.31B vs. FABP: $78.23M
BPHLF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.31B. FABP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $78.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPHLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFABP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPHLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FABP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FABP is a better buy in the long-term than BPHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FABP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FABP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

BPHLF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FABP (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPHLF($10.3B) has a higher market cap than FABP($78.2M). FABP YTD gains are higher at: 6.090 vs. BPHLF (-17.778).
BPHLFFABPBPHLF / FABP
Capitalization10.3B78.2M13,171%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-17.7786.090-292%
P/E Ratio11.57N/A-
Revenue125BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt99.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPHLF vs FABP: Fundamental Ratings
BPHLF
FABP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3358
SMR RATING
1..100
157
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7653
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7310
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FABP's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BPHLF (70). This means that FABP’s stock grew similarly to BPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

BPHLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as FABP (58). This means that BPHLF’s stock grew similarly to FABP’s over the last 12 months.

BPHLF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FABP (57). This means that BPHLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FABP’s over the last 12 months.

FABP's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as BPHLF (76). This means that FABP’s stock grew similarly to BPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

FABP's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPHLF (73). This means that FABP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPHLFFABP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
19%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FABP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMPO14.850.22
+1.50%
CompoSecure
RMBS65.890.89
+1.37%
Rambus
PXS2.890.02
+0.70%
Pyxis Tankers
AFJKU11.25N/A
N/A
Aimei Health Technology Co Ltd
VSTA4.28-0.02
-0.35%
Vasta Platform Limited

BPHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPHLF has been loosely correlated with KGTFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPHLF jumps, then KGTFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPHLF
1D Price
Change %
BPHLF100%
N/A
KGTFY - BPHLF
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PONT - BPHLF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HRGG - BPHLF
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.57%
BGKKF - BPHLF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MIFF - BPHLF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

FABP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FABP has been loosely correlated with BXRBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FABP jumps, then BXRBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FABP
1D Price
Change %
FABP100%
N/A
BXRBF - FABP
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BPHLF - FABP
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCCT - FABP
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EQGPF - FABP
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EXSR - FABP
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More