BPHLF
Price
$1.85
Change
-$0.26 (-12.32%)
Updated
Mar 18 closing price
Capitalization
10.31B
CCNB
Price
$11.25
Change
+$0.03 (+0.27%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
56.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPHLF vs CCNB

Header iconBPHLF vs CCNB Comparison
Open Charts BPHLF vs CCNBBanner chart's image
Bank of the Philippine Islands
Price$1.85
Change-$0.26 (-12.32%)
Volume$150
Capitalization10.31B
Coastal Carolina Bancshares
Price$11.25
Change+$0.03 (+0.27%)
Volume$700
Capitalization56.43M
BPHLF vs CCNB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPHLF vs. CCNB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPHLF is a Buy and CCNB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BPHLF: $1.85 vs. CCNB: $11.25)
Brand notoriety: BPHLF and CCNB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPHLF: 100% vs. CCNB: 29%
Market capitalization -- BPHLF: $10.31B vs. CCNB: $56.43M
BPHLF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.31B. CCNB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $56.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPHLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCCNB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPHLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CCNB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCNB is a better buy in the long-term than BPHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCNB’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CCNB’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BPHLF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CCNB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPHLF($10.3B) has a higher market cap than CCNB($56.4M). BPHLF has higher P/E ratio than CCNB: BPHLF (11.57) vs CCNB (7.80). CCNB YTD gains are higher at: 3.211 vs. BPHLF (-17.778). CCNB has less debt than BPHLF: CCNB (25M) vs BPHLF (99.7B). BPHLF has higher revenues than CCNB: BPHLF (125B) vs CCNB (26.7M).
BPHLFCCNBBPHLF / CCNB
Capitalization10.3B56.4M18,262%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-17.7783.211-554%
P/E Ratio11.577.80148%
Revenue125B26.7M468,165%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt99.7B25M398,800%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPHLF vs CCNB: Fundamental Ratings
BPHLF
CCNB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3324
SMR RATING
1..100
152
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7341
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCNB's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPHLF (70). This means that CCNB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

CCNB's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as BPHLF (33). This means that CCNB’s stock grew similarly to BPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

BPHLF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCNB (52). This means that BPHLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCNB’s over the last 12 months.

CCNB's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as BPHLF (76). This means that CCNB’s stock grew similarly to BPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

CCNB's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BPHLF (73). This means that CCNB’s stock grew similarly to BPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPHLFCCNB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TDCB8.900.38
+4.46%
Third Century Bancorp
FSGCY6.51N/A
N/A
First Gen Corp
RCKHF0.66N/A
N/A
Rockhopper Exploration Plc
UZAPF288.52N/A
N/A
Flughafen Zuerich Ag Kloten
BAYRY7.67-0.09
-1.16%
Bayer A.G.

BPHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPHLF has been loosely correlated with KGTFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPHLF jumps, then KGTFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPHLF
1D Price
Change %
BPHLF100%
N/A
KGTFY - BPHLF
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PONT - BPHLF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HRGG - BPHLF
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.57%
BGKKF - BPHLF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MIFF - BPHLF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

CCNB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCNB and KGTFY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCNB and KGTFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCNB
1D Price
Change %
CCNB100%
+0.27%
KGTFY - CCNB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNCFF - CCNB
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
WFCL - CCNB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INBC - CCNB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPHLF - CCNB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More