BPCGF
Price
$0.84
Change
-$0.05 (-5.62%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
12.78B
IBWC
Price
$39.00
Change
+$2.00 (+5.41%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
25.19M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPCGF vs IBWC

Header iconBPCGF vs IBWC Comparison
Open Charts BPCGF vs IBWCBanner chart's image
Banco Comercial Portugues S.A
Price$0.84
Change-$0.05 (-5.62%)
Volume$200
Capitalization12.78B
IBW Financial
Price$39.00
Change+$2.00 (+5.41%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization25.19M
BPCGF vs IBWC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IBWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPCGF vs. IBWC commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPCGF is a Hold and IBWC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BPCGF: $0.84 vs. IBWC: $39.00)
Brand notoriety: BPCGF and IBWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPCGF: 24% vs. IBWC: 180%
Market capitalization -- BPCGF: $12.78B vs. IBWC: $25.19M
BPCGF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.78B. IBWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $25.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPCGF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIBWC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPCGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IBWC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPCGF is a better buy in the long-term than IBWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPCGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBWC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPCGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IBWC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IBWC is a better buy in the short-term than BPCGF.

Price Growth

BPCGF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IBWC (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPCGF($12.8B) has a higher market cap than IBWC($25.2M). IBWC has higher P/E ratio than BPCGF: IBWC (27.08) vs BPCGF (12.09). BPCGF YTD gains are higher at: 90.532 vs. IBWC (-6.587).
BPCGFIBWCBPCGF / IBWC
Capitalization12.8B25.2M50,794%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD90.532-6.587-1,374%
P/E Ratio12.0927.0845%
Revenue3.82BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt6.92BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPCGF vs IBWC: Fundamental Ratings
BPCGF
IBWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9849
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2100
SMR RATING
1..100
9100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4261
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1028
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPCGF's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as IBWC (82). This means that BPCGF’s stock grew similarly to IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

BPCGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IBWC (100). This means that BPCGF’s stock grew significantly faster than IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

BPCGF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IBWC (100). This means that BPCGF’s stock grew significantly faster than IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

BPCGF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as IBWC (61). This means that BPCGF’s stock grew similarly to IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

BPCGF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as IBWC (28). This means that BPCGF’s stock grew similarly to IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPCGFIBWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IBWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSY1.280.07
+5.79%
Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited
AOS72.451.05
+1.47%
AO Smith Corp
VPG32.190.37
+1.16%
Vishay Precision Group
HE11.160.03
+0.27%
Hawaiian Electric Industries
SVIIU13.00-1.17
-8.26%
Spring Valley Acquisition Corp

BPCGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPCGF has been loosely correlated with MZTFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPCGF jumps, then MZTFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPCGF
1D Price
Change %
BPCGF100%
N/A
MZTFF - BPCGF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UNBK - BPCGF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IBWC - BPCGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBIA - BPCGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOTJ - BPCGF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
More

IBWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBWC has been loosely correlated with SWZNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IBWC jumps, then SWZNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBWC
1D Price
Change %
IBWC100%
N/A
SWZNF - IBWC
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHMG - IBWC
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
MCB - IBWC
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
FMBL - IBWC
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
BPCGF - IBWC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More