BPAQF
Price
$5.93
Change
+$0.13 (+2.24%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
91.91B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EIPAF
Price
$19.14
Change
+$0.15 (+0.79%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
57.52B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPAQF vs EIPAF

Header iconBPAQF vs EIPAF Comparison
Open Charts BPAQF vs EIPAFBanner chart's image
BP
Price$5.93
Change+$0.13 (+2.24%)
Volume$416
Capitalization91.91B
ENI S.p.A
Price$19.14
Change+$0.15 (+0.79%)
Volume$4.9K
Capitalization57.52B
BPAQF vs EIPAF Comparison Chart in %
BPAQF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EIPAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPAQF vs. EIPAF commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPAQF is a Hold and EIPAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (BPAQF: $5.93 vs. EIPAF: $19.14)
Brand notoriety: BPAQF and EIPAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPAQF: 2% vs. EIPAF: 369%
Market capitalization -- BPAQF: $91.91B vs. EIPAF: $57.52B
BPAQF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $91.91B. EIPAF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $57.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $544.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPAQF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEIPAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPAQF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EIPAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EIPAF is a better buy in the long-term than BPAQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPAQF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EIPAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPAQF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EIPAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EIPAF is a better buy in the short-term than BPAQF.

Price Growth

BPAQF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +6.94% price change this week, while EIPAF (@Integrated Oil) price change was +4.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+0.75% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPAQF($91.9B) has a higher market cap than EIPAF($57.5B). BPAQF has higher P/E ratio than EIPAF: BPAQF (57.80) vs EIPAF (20.04). BPAQF YTD gains are higher at: 4.108 vs. EIPAF (0.420). BPAQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31.3B vs. EIPAF (23.4B). BPAQF has more cash in the bank: 35B vs. EIPAF (16.3B). EIPAF has less debt than BPAQF: EIPAF (34.7B) vs BPAQF (74.8B). BPAQF has higher revenues than EIPAF: BPAQF (188B) vs EIPAF (85B).
BPAQFEIPAFBPAQF / EIPAF
Capitalization91.9B57.5B160%
EBITDA31.3B23.4B134%
Gain YTD4.1080.420979%
P/E Ratio57.8020.04288%
Revenue188B85B221%
Total Cash35B16.3B215%
Total Debt74.8B34.7B216%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPAQF vs EIPAF: Fundamental Ratings
BPAQF
EIPAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5093
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3031
SMR RATING
1..100
8884
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1048
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EIPAF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPAQF (67). This means that EIPAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

BPAQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as EIPAF (31). This means that BPAQF’s stock grew similarly to EIPAF’s over the last 12 months.

EIPAF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as BPAQF (88). This means that EIPAF’s stock grew similarly to BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

EIPAF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as BPAQF (50). This means that EIPAF’s stock grew similarly to BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

BPAQF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EIPAF (48). This means that BPAQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EIPAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPAQFEIPAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPAQF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EIPAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HNI46.120.80
+1.77%
HNI Corp
CARE20.380.14
+0.69%
Carter Bankshares
LOKVU10.99N/A
N/A
Live Oak Acquisition Corp. V
ATYR0.71-0.01
-1.59%
aTyr Pharma Inc
GL139.82-2.59
-1.82%
Globe Life

BPAQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPAQF has been loosely correlated with BP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPAQF jumps, then BP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPAQF
1D Price
Change %
BPAQF100%
N/A
BP - BPAQF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
SHEL - BPAQF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
E - BPAQF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
XOM - BPAQF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
EC - BPAQF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
More

EIPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EIPAF and GLPEF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EIPAF and GLPEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EIPAF
1D Price
Change %
EIPAF100%
N/A
GLPEF - EIPAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPAQF - EIPAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NFG - EIPAF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
SLNG - EIPAF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
TGS - EIPAF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
More