It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BPAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
BPAC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.05% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +60.37%.
Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| SPC | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 17% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 19% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 37% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 37% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 16% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BPAC and CXAI have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPAC and CXAI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BPAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPAC | 100% | N/A | ||
| CXAI - BPAC | 27% Poorly correlated | -5.58% | ||
| TWLV - BPAC | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SYM - BPAC | 3% Poorly correlated | +3.68% | ||
| FGMC - BPAC | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| CSLMF - BPAC | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPC and ESHA have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPC and ESHA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPC | 100% | N/A | ||
| ESHA - SPC | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
| BPAC - SPC | 17% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TRTLF - SPC | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MNTN - SPC | 11% Poorly correlated | -8.12% | ||
| SLAMF - SPC | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||