BP
Price
$33.89
Change
-$0.76 (-2.19%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
105.62B
65 days until earnings call
EC
Price
$10.43
Change
-$0.51 (-4.66%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
21.83B
9 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BP vs EC

Header iconBP vs EC Comparison
Open Charts BP vs ECBanner chart's image
BP
Price$33.89
Change-$0.76 (-2.19%)
Volume$12.5M
Capitalization105.62B
Ecopetrol SA
Price$10.43
Change-$0.51 (-4.66%)
Volume$2.78M
Capitalization21.83B
BP vs EC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BP vs. EC commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BP is a Buy and EC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BP: $35.31 vs. EC: $10.83)
Brand notoriety: BP: Notable vs. EC: Not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BP: 108% vs. EC: 171%
Market capitalization -- BP: $105.62B vs. EC: $21.83B
BP [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $105.62B. EC’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $21.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, EC is a better buy in the long-term than BP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EC is a better buy in the short-term than BP.

Price Growth

BP (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +2.20% price change this week, while EC (@Integrated Oil) price change was +10.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

BP is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

EC is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-1.86% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BP($106B) has a higher market cap than EC($21.8B). BP has higher P/E ratio than EC: BP (7.37) vs EC (4.87). EC YTD gains are higher at: 36.742 vs. BP (19.452). EC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.36T vs. BP (43.6B). EC has higher revenues than BP: EC (148.1T) vs BP (210B).
BPECBP / EC
Capitalization106B21.8B486%
EBITDA43.6B49.36T0%
Gain YTD19.45236.74253%
P/E Ratio7.374.87151%
Revenue210B148.1T0%
Total Cash28.6BN/A-
Total Debt63.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BP vs EC: Fundamental Ratings
BP
EC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2121
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6483
SMR RATING
1..100
8512
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
120
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EC's Valuation (9) in the Integrated Oil industry is significantly better than the same rating for BP (99). This means that EC’s stock grew significantly faster than BP’s over the last 12 months.

BP's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EC (83). This means that BP’s stock grew similarly to EC’s over the last 12 months.

EC's SMR Rating (12) in the Integrated Oil industry is significantly better than the same rating for BP (85). This means that EC’s stock grew significantly faster than BP’s over the last 12 months.

EC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as BP (44). This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to BP’s over the last 12 months.

BP's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EC (20). This means that BP’s stock grew similarly to EC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPEC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

BP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BP has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BP jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BP
1D Price
Change %
BP100%
+0.89%
SHEL - BP
78%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
TTE - BP
70%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
XOM - BP
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
REPYY - BP
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
E - BP
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
More

EC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EC has been loosely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EC jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EC
1D Price
Change %
EC100%
+5.66%
SHEL - EC
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
BP - EC
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
EQNR - EC
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
REPYY - EC
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
TTE - EC
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
More