BOWNU
Price
$12.50
Change
-$0.52 (-3.99%)
Updated
May 30, 10:55 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
QETA
Price
$10.73
Change
-$0.13 (-1.20%)
Updated
Jun 13, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
91.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOWNU vs QETA

Header iconBOWNU vs QETA Comparison
Open Charts BOWNU vs QETABanner chart's image
Bowen Acquisition
Price$12.50
Change-$0.52 (-3.99%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Quetta Acquisition
Price$10.73
Change-$0.13 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization91.08M
BOWNU vs QETA Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOWNU vs. QETA commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOWNU is a StrongBuy and QETA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (BOWNU: $13.02 vs. QETA: $10.86)
Brand notoriety: BOWNU and QETA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOWNU: 86% vs. QETA: 11%
Market capitalization -- BOWNU: $0 vs. QETA: $91.08M
BOWNU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. QETA’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $91.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOWNU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQETA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BOWNU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QETA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BOWNU and QETA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

BOWNU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QETA (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.25% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOWNU YTD gains are higher at: 18.256 vs. QETA (2.938).
BOWNUQETABOWNU / QETA
CapitalizationN/A91.1M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.2562.938621%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash501KN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JUNW31.35-0.16
-0.49%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 Jun ETF
TILT216.41-2.84
-1.30%
FlexShares Mstar US Mkt Factors Tilt ETF
FNGO98.22-2.07
-2.06%
MicroSectors™ FANG+™ 2X Leveraged ETN
ISMD34.45-0.75
-2.13%
Inspire Small/Mid Cap ETF
NESGX16.60-0.57
-3.32%
Needham Small Cap Growth Retail

BOWNU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOWNU has been loosely correlated with BOWN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOWNU jumps, then BOWN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOWNU
1D Price
Change %
BOWNU100%
N/A
BOWN - BOWNU
62%
Loosely correlated
-4.67%
MLAC - BOWNU
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
ATMV - BOWNU
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KACLF - BOWNU
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VMCUF - BOWNU
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QETA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QETA and ATMCU have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QETA and ATMCU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QETA
1D Price
Change %
QETA100%
N/A
ATMCU - QETA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSPOU - QETA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOWNU - QETA
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFJK - QETA
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOWN - QETA
16%
Poorly correlated
-4.67%
More