BOWN
Price
$9.19
Change
+$0.05 (+0.55%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
95.42M
LEGT
Price
$10.74
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
259.28M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOWN vs LEGT

Header iconBOWN vs LEGT Comparison
Open Charts BOWN vs LEGTBanner chart's image
Bowen Acquisition
Price$9.19
Change+$0.05 (+0.55%)
Volume$2.83K
Capitalization95.42M
Legato Merger
Price$10.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.93K
Capitalization259.28M
BOWN vs LEGT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BOWN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOWN vs. LEGT commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOWN is a Hold and LEGT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BOWN: $9.19 vs. LEGT: $10.74)
Brand notoriety: BOWN and LEGT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOWN: 123% vs. LEGT: 31%
Market capitalization -- BOWN: $95.42M vs. LEGT: $259.28M
BOWN [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $95.42M. LEGT’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $259.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOWN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLEGT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BOWN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LEGT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BOWN and LEGT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOWN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEGT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOWN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LEGT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LEGT is a better buy in the short-term than BOWN.

Price Growth

BOWN (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LEGT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +82.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.43% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LEGT($259M) has a higher market cap than BOWN($95.4M). LEGT YTD gains are higher at: 4.373 vs. BOWN (-15.842).
BOWNLEGTBOWN / LEGT
Capitalization95.4M259M37%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-15.8424.373-362%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash501KN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOWNLEGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
5%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
1%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
38%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
2%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOWN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SEEMF0.04N/A
+10.53%
Seeing Machines Ltd.
NPPNY5.21N/A
N/A
Nippon Shinyaku Co. Ltd.
WOBK56.99N/A
N/A
Woodsboro Bank MD
BVRDF31.94-0.22
-0.68%
BUREAU VERITAS SA
NAUFF0.26N/A
-1.85%
Nevgold Corp.

BOWN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOWN has been loosely correlated with BOWNU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOWN jumps, then BOWNU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOWN
1D Price
Change %
BOWN100%
N/A
BOWNU - BOWN
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PLAOF - BOWN
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSSAF - BOWN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISRL - BOWN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSPOU - BOWN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LEGT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LEGT and ATMV have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LEGT and ATMV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEGT
1D Price
Change %
LEGT100%
N/A
ATMV - LEGT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPKL - LEGT
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
HLXB - LEGT
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
ANSC - LEGT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOWN - LEGT
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More