BOWN
Price
$10.10
Change
-$0.10 (-0.98%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
95.42M
ESHA
Price
$11.12
Change
+$0.13 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jun 30, 01:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
151.76M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOWN vs ESHA

Header iconBOWN vs ESHA Comparison
Open Charts BOWN vs ESHABanner chart's image
Bowen Acquisition
Price$10.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.98%)
Volume$546
Capitalization95.42M
ESH Acquisition
Price$11.12
Change+$0.13 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization151.76M
BOWN vs ESHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BOWN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOWN vs. ESHA commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOWN is a Hold and ESHA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BOWN: $10.10 vs. ESHA: $10.99)
Brand notoriety: BOWN and ESHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOWN: 6% vs. ESHA: 9%
Market capitalization -- BOWN: $95.42M vs. ESHA: $151.76M
BOWN [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $95.42M. ESHA’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $151.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOWN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileESHA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BOWN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ESHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESHA is a better buy in the long-term than BOWN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOWN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESHA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOWN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ESHA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESHA is a better buy in the short-term than BOWN.

Price Growth

BOWN (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +16.16% price change this week, while ESHA (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.44% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESHA($152M) has a higher market cap than BOWN($95.4M). ESHA YTD gains are higher at: 2.043 vs. BOWN (-7.509). ESHA has more cash in the bank: 1.97M vs. BOWN (501K).
BOWNESHABOWN / ESHA
Capitalization95.4M152M63%
EBITDAN/A-391.76K-
Gain YTD-7.5092.043-368%
P/E RatioN/A167.28-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash501K1.97M25%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOWNESHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
10%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
12%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
38%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOWN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESAIY7.090.02
+0.28%
Eisai Co., Ltd.
PCCWY7.00N/A
N/A
PCCW Limited
AVHHL1.00N/A
N/A
Avita Medical, Inc.
BBUZ0.07N/A
N/A
Bebuzee Inc.
HERB0.03N/A
-11.43%
YaSheng Group

BOWN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BOWN and MSSAF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BOWN and MSSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOWN
1D Price
Change %
BOWN100%
-0.98%
MSSAF - BOWN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISRL - BOWN
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
HSPOU - BOWN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATMV - BOWN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KACUF - BOWN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ESHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESHA has been loosely correlated with ASPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESHA jumps, then ASPC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESHA
1D Price
Change %
ESHA100%
N/A
ASPC - ESHA
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
MSSUF - ESHA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGMC - ESHA
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
BOWN - ESHA
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
RMHI - ESHA
11%
Poorly correlated
+35.14%
More