BOW
Price
$30.54
Change
-$0.51 (-1.64%)
Updated
Sep 8, 12:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.08B
PRA
Price
$23.80
Change
+$0.04 (+0.17%)
Updated
Sep 8, 01:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.22B
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOW vs PRA

Header iconBOW vs PRA Comparison
Open Charts BOW vs PRABanner chart's image
Bowhead Specialty Holdings
Price$30.54
Change-$0.51 (-1.64%)
Volume$210
Capitalization1.08B
ProAssurance
Price$23.80
Change+$0.04 (+0.17%)
Volume$700
Capitalization1.22B
BOW vs PRA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOW vs. PRA commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOW is a Buy and PRA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BOW: $31.05 vs. PRA: $23.76)
Brand notoriety: BOW and PRA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOW: 120% vs. PRA: 63%
Market capitalization -- BOW: $1.08B vs. PRA: $1.22B
BOW [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.08B. PRA’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $143B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePRA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PRA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRA is a better buy in the long-term than BOW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PRA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BOW is a better buy in the short-term than PRA.

Price Growth

BOW (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.03% price change this week, while PRA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

PRA is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.38% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRA($1.22B) has a higher market cap than BOW($1.08B). PRA has higher P/E ratio than BOW: PRA (25.01) vs BOW (20.56). PRA YTD gains are higher at: 49.340 vs. BOW (-12.584). PRA has more cash in the bank: 3.96B vs. BOW (762M). PRA has higher revenues than BOW: PRA (1.11B) vs BOW (492M).
BOWPRABOW / PRA
Capitalization1.08B1.22B88%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.58449.340-26%
P/E Ratio20.5625.0182%
Revenue492M1.11B45%
Total Cash762M3.96B19%
Total DebtN/A439M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRA: Fundamental Ratings
PRA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOWPRA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HISGX11.330.10
+0.89%
Harbor Small Cap Growth Inv
ACWZX19.340.15
+0.78%
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Z
BRIUX17.100.11
+0.65%
Baron Real Estate Income R6
FMFEX93.440.56
+0.60%
Fidelity Advisor Materials I
NBGAX63.030.30
+0.48%
Neuberger Berman Genesis Adv

BOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOW has been loosely correlated with THG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOW jumps, then THG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOW
1D Price
Change %
BOW100%
-3.12%
THG - BOW
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
ORI - BOW
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
SKWD - BOW
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
AFG - BOW
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
RLI - BOW
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
More

PRA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRA and UFCS have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRA and UFCS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRA
1D Price
Change %
PRA100%
N/A
UFCS - PRA
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
BOW - PRA
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
BNT - PRA
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
SAFT - PRA
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
ALL - PRA
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.26%
More