BOUYF
Price
$42.27
Change
-$1.23 (-2.83%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
21.13B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CCOHF
Price
$0.88
Change
-$0.42 (-32.31%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
6.24B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOUYF vs CCOHF

Header iconBOUYF vs CCOHF Comparison
Open Charts BOUYF vs CCOHFBanner chart's image
Bouygues SA
Price$42.27
Change-$1.23 (-2.83%)
Volume$2.75K
Capitalization21.13B
China State Construction International Holdings
Price$0.88
Change-$0.42 (-32.31%)
Volume$29.6K
Capitalization6.24B
BOUYF vs CCOHF Comparison Chart in %
CCOHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOUYF vs. CCOHF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOUYF is a Buy and CCOHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BOUYF: $48.49 vs. CCOHF: $1.16)
Brand notoriety: BOUYF and CCOHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOUYF: 100% vs. CCOHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BOUYF: $21.13B vs. CCOHF: $6.24B
BOUYF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $21.13B. CCOHF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $6.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $9.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOUYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCCOHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BOUYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CCOHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BOUYF is a better buy in the long-term than CCOHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCOHF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CCOHF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

BOUYF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CCOHF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.17% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOUYF($21.1B) has a higher market cap than CCOHF($6.24B). BOUYF has higher P/E ratio than CCOHF: BOUYF (14.95) vs CCOHF (4.55). BOUYF (0.000) and CCOHF (0.000) have similar YTD gains .
BOUYFCCOHFBOUYF / CCOHF
Capitalization21.1B6.24B338%
EBITDA5.74BN/A-
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E Ratio14.954.55328%
Revenue57.1BN/A-
Total Cash3.98BN/A-
Total Debt14.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BOUYF vs CCOHF: Fundamental Ratings
BOUYF
CCOHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5036
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7462
SMR RATING
1..100
7563
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4754
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCOHF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BOUYF (20). This means that CCOHF’s stock grew similarly to BOUYF’s over the last 12 months.

CCOHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as BOUYF (74). This means that CCOHF’s stock grew similarly to BOUYF’s over the last 12 months.

CCOHF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as BOUYF (75). This means that CCOHF’s stock grew similarly to BOUYF’s over the last 12 months.

BOUYF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CCOHF (54). This means that BOUYF’s stock grew similarly to CCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

BOUYF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCOHF (100). This means that BOUYF’s stock grew significantly faster than CCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOUYFCCOHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCOHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWZ38.040.59
+1.58%
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
IBUY72.50N/A
N/A
Amplify Online Retail ETF
FLCA48.76N/A
N/A
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
TVC24.34-0.03
-0.12%
Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1998 Series D due June 1 2028
XTJL39.17-0.15
-0.38%
Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF Jul

BOUYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BOUYF and EFGSY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BOUYF and EFGSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOUYF
1D Price
Change %
BOUYF100%
N/A
EFGSY - BOUYF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
BOUYY - BOUYF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
ARCVF - BOUYF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCOHF - BOUYF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCKIF - BOUYF
6%
Poorly correlated
+6.40%
More

CCOHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOHF and BBCP have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOHF and BBCP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCOHF
1D Price
Change %
CCOHF100%
N/A
BBCP - CCOHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
BFLBY - CCOHF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
BOUYY - CCOHF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
BOUYF - CCOHF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BIRDF - CCOHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.38%
More