It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BOTRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHTO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BOTRF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HTO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BOTRF (@Water Utilities) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HTO (@Water Utilities) price change was -1.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Water Utilities industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.10%.
BOTRF is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.
HTO is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Water utilities operate water treatment plants, and/or distribute water to residential and commercial customers. Companies operating in this industry are largely responsible for the safe and timely distribution of water. While most water systems are local or regional, some of the companies might have operations across several states. The industry is expected to be closely monitored by regulators for quality checks on the water being distributed. Investing in upgrading infrastructure is a major factor in bolstering the supply of clean/safe-to-use water. Given the absolute necessity of water in our lives, the industry is largely non-cyclical. American Water Works Company, Inc., Aqua America, Inc., American States Water Co. and California Water Service Group are some of the major water utilities companies in the U.S.
BOTRF | HTO | BOTRF / HTO | |
Capitalization | 451M | 1.79B | 25% |
EBITDA | 2.18B | 265M | 823% |
Gain YTD | -3.019 | 5.753 | -52% |
P/E Ratio | 3.47 | 20.87 | 17% |
Revenue | 6.73B | 670M | 1,004% |
Total Cash | 3.07B | 9.72M | 31,544% |
Total Debt | 15.3B | 1.75B | 876% |
BOTRF | HTO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BOTRF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HTO (68) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that BOTRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HTO’s over the last 12 months.
BOTRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HTO (100) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that BOTRF’s stock grew similarly to HTO’s over the last 12 months.
HTO's SMR Rating (78) in the Water Utilities industry is in the same range as BOTRF (98) in the null industry. This means that HTO’s stock grew similarly to BOTRF’s over the last 12 months.
HTO's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Water Utilities industry is in the same range as BOTRF (72) in the null industry. This means that HTO’s stock grew similarly to BOTRF’s over the last 12 months.
BOTRF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HTO (69) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that BOTRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HTO’s over the last 12 months.
BOTRF | HTO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago42% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago35% | 3 days ago60% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago34% | 3 days ago60% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 20 days ago56% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago12% | 3 days ago48% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GIIAX | 10.11 | 0.09 | +0.90% |
Nationwide International Index A | |||
WIEFX | 16.12 | 0.13 | +0.81% |
Boston Trust Walden International Eq | |||
DREVX | 19.46 | 0.15 | +0.78% |
BNY Mellon Large Cap Securities Inc | |||
IOLZX | 26.74 | 0.11 | +0.41% |
ICON Equity Institutional | |||
JMGMX | 54.98 | 0.03 | +0.05% |
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth R6 |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BOTRF and WTRG have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BOTRF and WTRG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BOTRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BOTRF | 100% | N/A | ||
WTRG - BOTRF | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
YORW - BOTRF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
HTO - BOTRF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ARIS - BOTRF | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.97% | ||
AWAEF - BOTRF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTO has been closely correlated with CWT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HTO jumps, then CWT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HTO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HTO | 100% | N/A | ||
CWT - HTO | 81% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
AWR - HTO | 79% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
YORW - HTO | 75% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
WTRG - HTO | 74% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
MSEX - HTO | 72% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
More |