BOTRF
Price
$0.21
Change
+$0.04 (+23.53%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Capitalization
556.76M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CWAFF
Price
$0.72
Change
-$0.04 (-5.26%)
Updated
Dec 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.09B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOTRF vs CWAFF

Header iconBOTRF vs CWAFF Comparison
Open Charts BOTRF vs CWAFFBanner chart's image
China Everbright Water
Price$0.21
Change+$0.04 (+23.53%)
Volume$2.3K
Capitalization556.76M
China Water Affairs Group
Price$0.72
Change-$0.04 (-5.26%)
Volume$501
Capitalization1.09B
BOTRF vs CWAFF Comparison Chart in %
BOTRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CWAFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOTRF vs. CWAFF commentary
Dec 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOTRF is a Hold and CWAFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BOTRF: $0.21 vs. CWAFF: $0.72)
Brand notoriety: BOTRF and CWAFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Water Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOTRF: 16% vs. CWAFF: 25%
Market capitalization -- BOTRF: $556.76M vs. CWAFF: $1.09B
BOTRF [@Water Utilities] is valued at $556.76M. CWAFF’s [@Water Utilities] market capitalization is $1.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Water Utilities] industry ranges from $25.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Water Utilities] industry is $4.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOTRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCWAFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BOTRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CWAFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BOTRF is a better buy in the long-term than CWAFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOTRF’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CWAFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOTRF’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CWAFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BOTRF is a better buy in the short-term than CWAFF.

Price Growth

BOTRF (@Water Utilities) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CWAFF (@Water Utilities) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Water Utilities industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.32%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Water Utilities (-0.89% weekly)

Water utilities operate water treatment plants, and/or distribute water to residential and commercial customers. Companies operating in this industry are largely responsible for the safe and timely distribution of water. While most water systems are local or regional, some of the companies might have operations across several states. The industry is expected to be closely monitored by regulators for quality checks on the water being distributed. Investing in upgrading infrastructure is a major factor in bolstering the supply of clean/safe-to-use water. Given the absolute necessity of water in our lives, the industry is largely non-cyclical. American Water Works Company, Inc., Aqua America, Inc., American States Water Co. and California Water Service Group are some of the major water utilities companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWAFF($1.09B) has a higher market cap than BOTRF($557M). CWAFF has higher P/E ratio than BOTRF: CWAFF (10.26) vs BOTRF (4.55). CWAFF YTD gains are higher at: 34.982 vs. BOTRF (17.982).
BOTRFCWAFFBOTRF / CWAFF
Capitalization557M1.09B51%
EBITDA2.2BN/A-
Gain YTD17.98234.98251%
P/E Ratio4.5510.2644%
Revenue6.78BN/A-
Total Cash1.87BN/A-
Total Debt17.3BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BOTRF vs CWAFF: Fundamental Ratings
BOTRF
CWAFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9924
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81100
SMR RATING
1..100
9753
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
208
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BOTRF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CWAFF (33). This means that BOTRF’s stock grew similarly to CWAFF’s over the last 12 months.

BOTRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as CWAFF (100). This means that BOTRF’s stock grew similarly to CWAFF’s over the last 12 months.

CWAFF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BOTRF (97). This means that CWAFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BOTRF’s over the last 12 months.

BOTRF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CWAFF (58). This means that BOTRF’s stock grew similarly to CWAFF’s over the last 12 months.

CWAFF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as BOTRF (20). This means that CWAFF’s stock grew similarly to BOTRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOTRFCWAFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOTRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CWAFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
URLGX2.840.01
+0.35%
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth R
WASAX22.800.04
+0.18%
Nomura Asset Strategy Fund Cl A
HEQCX6.010.01
+0.17%
Monteagle Opportunity Equity Instl
PNOYX142.140.07
+0.05%
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
ASCZX12.22-0.08
-0.65%
Alger Small Cap Growth Z

BOTRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BOTRF and AWAEF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BOTRF and AWAEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOTRF
1D Price
Change %
BOTRF100%
N/A
AWAEF - BOTRF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARTNB - BOTRF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWAFF - BOTRF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BJWTF - BOTRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTRG - BOTRF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CWAFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWAFF and YORW have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWAFF and YORW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWAFF
1D Price
Change %
CWAFF100%
N/A
YORW - CWAFF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
ARIS - CWAFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTRG - CWAFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOTRF - CWAFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWRS - CWAFF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
More