BOTJ
Price
$13.90
Change
-$0.11 (-0.79%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
47.07M
MVBF
Price
$15.84
Change
+$0.12 (+0.76%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
283.06M
15 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BOTJ vs MVBF

Header iconBOTJ vs MVBF Comparison
Open Charts BOTJ vs MVBFBanner chart's image
Bank of the James Financial Group
Price$13.90
Change-$0.11 (-0.79%)
Volume$8.05K
Capitalization47.07M
MVB Financial
Price$15.84
Change+$0.12 (+0.76%)
Volume$24.94K
Capitalization283.06M
BOTJ vs MVBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MVBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOTJ vs. MVBF commentary
Apr 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOTJ is a Hold and MVBF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BOTJ: $13.90 vs. MVBF: $15.84)
Brand notoriety: BOTJ and MVBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOTJ: 115% vs. MVBF: 84%
Market capitalization -- BOTJ: $47.07M vs. MVBF: $283.06M
BOTJ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $47.07M. MVBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $283.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOTJ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMVBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BOTJ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MVBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BOTJ is a better buy in the long-term than MVBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MVBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MVBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BOTJ (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.49% price change this week, while MVBF (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

BOTJ is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2023.

MVBF is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVBF($283M) has a higher market cap than BOTJ($47.1M). MVBF has higher P/E ratio than BOTJ: MVBF (12.82) vs BOTJ (5.35). BOTJ YTD gains are higher at: -11.737 vs. MVBF (-22.772). BOTJ has less debt than MVBF: BOTJ (20.1M) vs MVBF (80.3M). MVBF has higher revenues than BOTJ: MVBF (146M) vs BOTJ (42.3M).
BOTJMVBFBOTJ / MVBF
Capitalization47.1M283M17%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-11.737-22.77252%
P/E Ratio5.3512.8242%
Revenue42.3M146M29%
Total CashN/A8.11M-
Total Debt20.1M80.3M25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BOTJ vs MVBF: Fundamental Ratings
BOTJ
MVBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4172
SMR RATING
1..100
4633
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4377
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1357
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MVBF's Valuation (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BOTJ (30). This means that MVBF’s stock grew similarly to BOTJ’s over the last 12 months.

BOTJ's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MVBF (72). This means that BOTJ’s stock grew similarly to MVBF’s over the last 12 months.

MVBF's SMR Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BOTJ (46). This means that MVBF’s stock grew similarly to BOTJ’s over the last 12 months.

BOTJ's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MVBF (77). This means that BOTJ’s stock grew somewhat faster than MVBF’s over the last 12 months.

BOTJ's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MVBF (57). This means that BOTJ’s stock grew somewhat faster than MVBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MVBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MVBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

BOTJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BOTJ and PBAM have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BOTJ and PBAM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOTJ
1D Price
Change %
BOTJ100%
+1.31%
PBAM - BOTJ
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SQCF - BOTJ
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
OPHC - BOTJ
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
MVBF - BOTJ
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
PBHC - BOTJ
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MVBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MVBF has been closely correlated with RBCAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MVBF jumps, then RBCAA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MVBF
1D Price
Change %
MVBF100%
+0.76%
RBCAA - MVBF
77%
Closely correlated
+2.46%
PEBO - MVBF
75%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
FNLC - MVBF
75%
Closely correlated
+1.96%
GSBC - MVBF
74%
Closely correlated
+3.55%
NWBI - MVBF
74%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
More