BOTJ
Price
$20.45
Change
-$0.54 (-2.57%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
92.91M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DNSKF
Price
$45.41
Change
+$3.73 (+8.95%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
43.65B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOTJ vs DNSKF

Header iconBOTJ vs DNSKF Comparison
Open Charts BOTJ vs DNSKFBanner chart's image
Bank of the James Financial Group
Price$20.45
Change-$0.54 (-2.57%)
Volume$6.58K
Capitalization92.91M
Danske Bank A/S
Price$45.41
Change+$3.73 (+8.95%)
Volume$250
Capitalization43.65B
BOTJ vs DNSKF Comparison Chart in %
BOTJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DNSKF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOTJ vs. DNSKF commentary
Feb 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOTJ is a Buy and DNSKF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 08, 2026
Stock price -- (BOTJ: $20.45 vs. DNSKF: $51.44)
Brand notoriety: BOTJ and DNSKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOTJ: 231% vs. DNSKF: 23%
Market capitalization -- BOTJ: $92.91M vs. DNSKF: $43.65B
BOTJ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $92.91M. DNSKF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $43.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $160.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOTJ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDNSKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BOTJ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DNSKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DNSKF is a better buy in the long-term than BOTJ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOTJ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DNSKF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOTJ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DNSKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DNSKF is a better buy in the short-term than BOTJ.

Price Growth

BOTJ (@Regional Banks) experienced а +8.20% price change this week, while DNSKF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.80% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNSKF($43.7B) has a higher market cap than BOTJ($92.9M). DNSKF has higher P/E ratio than BOTJ: DNSKF (11.67) vs BOTJ (10.28). BOTJ YTD gains are higher at: 10.065 vs. DNSKF (0.508). BOTJ has less debt than DNSKF: BOTJ (8.84M) vs DNSKF (1.1T). DNSKF has higher revenues than BOTJ: DNSKF (56.1B) vs BOTJ (46.4M).
BOTJDNSKFBOTJ / DNSKF
Capitalization92.9M43.7B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.0650.5081,981%
P/E Ratio10.2811.6788%
Revenue46.4M56.1B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt8.84M1.1T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BOTJ vs DNSKF: Fundamental Ratings
BOTJ
DNSKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
425
SMR RATING
1..100
553
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BOTJ's Valuation (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as DNSKF (50) in the null industry. This means that BOTJ’s stock grew similarly to DNSKF’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BOTJ (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that DNSKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BOTJ’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BOTJ (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that DNSKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BOTJ’s over the last 12 months.

BOTJ's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as DNSKF (44) in the null industry. This means that BOTJ’s stock grew similarly to DNSKF’s over the last 12 months.

BOTJ's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as DNSKF (100) in the null industry. This means that BOTJ’s stock grew similarly to DNSKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOTJDNSKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOTJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DNSKF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTLS5.510.35
+6.78%
Materialise NV
ROCK53.911.71
+3.28%
Gibraltar Industries
BGMSP3.73N/A
N/A
Bio Green Med Solution Inc
CADE42.11N/A
N/A
Cadence Bank
LONA4.58-0.21
-4.38%
LeonaBio Inc.

BOTJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOTJ has been loosely correlated with MOFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOTJ jumps, then MOFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOTJ
1D Price
Change %
BOTJ100%
-2.57%
MOFG - BOTJ
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
BLFY - BOTJ
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.18%
BCH - BOTJ
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
BSAC - BOTJ
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
BAP - BOTJ
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
More

DNSKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNSKF and FSDK have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNSKF and FSDK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNSKF
1D Price
Change %
DNSKF100%
N/A
FSDK - DNSKF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOTJ - DNSKF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.57%
BPIRY - DNSKF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWPP - DNSKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTYP - DNSKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More