BOTJ
Price
$13.76
Change
-$0.14 (-1.01%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
47.07M
BPCGF
Price
$0.80
Change
+$0.03 (+3.90%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
4.14B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOTJ vs BPCGF

Header iconBOTJ vs BPCGF Comparison
Open Charts BOTJ vs BPCGFBanner chart's image
Bank of the James Financial Group
Price$13.76
Change-$0.14 (-1.01%)
Volume$916
Capitalization47.07M
Banco Comercial Portugues S.A
Price$0.80
Change+$0.03 (+3.90%)
Volume$9.57K
Capitalization4.14B
BOTJ vs BPCGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BOTJ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BPCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOTJ vs. BPCGF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOTJ is a Hold and BPCGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BOTJ: $13.76 vs. BPCGF: $0.80)
Brand notoriety: BOTJ and BPCGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOTJ: 14% vs. BPCGF: 921%
Market capitalization -- BOTJ: $47.07M vs. BPCGF: $4.14B
BOTJ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $47.07M. BPCGF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOTJ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBPCGF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BOTJ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BPCGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPCGF is a better buy in the long-term than BOTJ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOTJ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BPCGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOTJ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • BPCGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPCGF is a better buy in the short-term than BOTJ.

Price Growth

BOTJ (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.68% price change this week, while BPCGF (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPCGF($4.14B) has a higher market cap than BOTJ($47.1M). BPCGF has higher P/E ratio than BOTJ: BPCGF (13.72) vs BOTJ (5.35). BPCGF YTD gains are higher at: 79.864 vs. BOTJ (-11.977). BOTJ has less debt than BPCGF: BOTJ (20.1M) vs BPCGF (4.54B). BPCGF has higher revenues than BOTJ: BPCGF (3.37B) vs BOTJ (42.3M).
BOTJBPCGFBOTJ / BPCGF
Capitalization47.1M4.14B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-11.97779.864-15%
P/E Ratio5.3513.7239%
Revenue42.3M3.37B1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt20.1M4.54B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BOTJ vs BPCGF: Fundamental Ratings
BOTJ
BPCGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
503
SMR RATING
1..100
528
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5638
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1810
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BOTJ's Valuation (32) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPCGF (77) in the null industry. This means that BOTJ’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPCGF’s over the last 12 months.

BPCGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BOTJ (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BPCGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BOTJ’s over the last 12 months.

BPCGF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BOTJ (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BPCGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BOTJ’s over the last 12 months.

BPCGF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as BOTJ (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BPCGF’s stock grew similarly to BOTJ’s over the last 12 months.

BPCGF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as BOTJ (18) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BPCGF’s stock grew similarly to BOTJ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOTJBPCGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOTJ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BPCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEIP6.740.14
+2.12%
MEI Pharma
KEN48.740.49
+1.02%
KENON HOLDINGS Ltd
ABT126.540.90
+0.72%
Abbott Laboratories
ESNT56.700.30
+0.53%
Essent Group Ltd
KMDA7.72-0.06
-0.77%
Kamada Ltd

BOTJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BOTJ and PBAM have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BOTJ and PBAM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOTJ
1D Price
Change %
BOTJ100%
-0.97%
PBAM - BOTJ
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
PBHC - BOTJ
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
SQCF - BOTJ
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
OPHC - BOTJ
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
MVBF - BOTJ
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
More

BPCGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPCGF has been loosely correlated with MZTFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPCGF jumps, then MZTFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPCGF
1D Price
Change %
BPCGF100%
+3.88%
MZTFF - BPCGF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UNBK - BPCGF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IBWC - BPCGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBIA - BPCGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOTJ - BPCGF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
More