BORT
Price
$32.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
CMBNF
Price
$66.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Ad is loading...

BORT vs CMBNF

Header iconBORT vs CMBNF Comparison
Open Charts BORT vs CMBNFBanner chart's image
Bank of Botetourt (Buchanan, VA)
Price$32.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.1K
CapitalizationN/A
CEMBRA MONEY BK AG
Price$66.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
BORT vs CMBNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BORT vs. CMBNF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BORT is a Hold and CMBNF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (BORT: $32.00 vs. CMBNF: $66.00)
Brand notoriety: BORT and CMBNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BORT: 389% vs. CMBNF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BORT: $58.23M vs. CMBNF: $2.23B
BORT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $58.23M. CMBNF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BORT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMBNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BORT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMBNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BORT is a better buy in the long-term than CMBNF.

Price Growth

BORT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.04% price change this week, while CMBNF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.80% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBNF($2.23B) has a higher market cap than BORT($58.2M). BORT YTD gains are higher at: 15.715 vs. CMBNF (0.000). BORT has less debt than CMBNF: BORT (310K) vs CMBNF (3.1B). CMBNF has higher revenues than BORT: CMBNF (512M) vs BORT (13.9M).
BORTCMBNFBORT / CMBNF
Capitalization58.2M2.23B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.7150.000-
P/E RatioN/A11.79-
Revenue13.9M512M3%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt310K3.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BORT: Fundamental Ratings
BORT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
30
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34
SMR RATING
1..100
7
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
10

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

BORT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BORT and CMBNF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BORT and CMBNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BORT
1D Price
Change %
BORT100%
N/A
CMBNF - BORT
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLMIF - BORT
23%
Poorly correlated
+28.75%
FFNW - BORT
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
BOID - BORT
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPIRF - BORT
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBNF has been loosely correlated with BLMIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBNF jumps, then BLMIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBNF
1D Price
Change %
CMBNF100%
N/A
BLMIF - CMBNF
64%
Loosely correlated
+28.75%
BWAGF - CMBNF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BORT - CMBNF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCXS - CMBNF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BAP - CMBNF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
More