BONXF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
30.72M
GSISF
Price
$3.35
Change
-$0.22 (-6.16%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
4.28B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BONXF vs GSISF

Header iconBONXF vs GSISF Comparison
Open Charts BONXF vs GSISFBanner chart's image
Bonterra Resources
Price$0.14
Change-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Volume$169.42K
Capitalization30.72M
Genesis Minerals
Price$3.35
Change-$0.22 (-6.16%)
Volume$428
Capitalization4.28B
BONXF vs GSISF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BONXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BONXF vs. GSISF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BONXF is a Hold and GSISF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BONXF: $0.15 vs. GSISF: $3.35)
Brand notoriety: BONXF and GSISF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BONXF: 68% vs. GSISF: 28%
Market capitalization -- BONXF: $33.13M vs. GSISF: $4.28B
BONXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $33.13M. GSISF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BONXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGSISF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BONXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GSISF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSISF is a better buy in the long-term than BONXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BONXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSISF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BONXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSISF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BONXF is a better buy in the short-term than GSISF.

Price Growth

BONXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.59% price change this week, while GSISF (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6063.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.35% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSISF($4.28B) has a higher market cap than BONXF($30.7M). GSISF YTD gains are higher at: 100.599 vs. BONXF (-8.228). GSISF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 463M vs. BONXF (-8.42M). GSISF has more cash in the bank: 240M vs. BONXF (8.49M). GSISF has higher revenues than BONXF: GSISF (920M) vs BONXF (0).
BONXFGSISFBONXF / GSISF
Capitalization30.7M4.28B1%
EBITDA-8.42M463M-2%
Gain YTD-8.228100.599-8%
P/E RatioN/A25.97-
Revenue0920M-
Total Cash8.49M240M4%
Total DebtN/A201M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BONXF: Fundamental Ratings
BONXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BONXFGSISF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BONXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTT22.520.06
+0.27%
BlackRock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust
NFLT23.050.01
+0.05%
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sect Bd ETF
UDI31.130.01
+0.04%
USCF ESG Dividend Income ETF
EWM25.74-0.05
-0.19%
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF
IBHJ26.81-0.06
-0.22%
iShares iBonds 2030 Term Hi Yld & IncETF

BONXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BONXF and WDOFF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BONXF and WDOFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BONXF
1D Price
Change %
BONXF100%
-5.29%
WDOFF - BONXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.94%
WRLGF - BONXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.31%
SNWGF - BONXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
DRDGF - BONXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSISF - BONXF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GSISF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSISF has been loosely correlated with MMTMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSISF jumps, then MMTMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSISF
1D Price
Change %
GSISF100%
N/A
MMTMF - GSISF
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.41%
MJGCF - GSISF
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.45%
KSSRF - GSISF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WKGFF - GSISF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLGCF - GSISF
23%
Poorly correlated
+40.51%
More