BOMXF
Price
$2.07
Change
-$0.01 (-0.48%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
SLNH
Price
$2.75
Change
-$0.19 (-6.46%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
89.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOMXF vs SLNH

Header iconBOMXF vs SLNH Comparison
Open Charts BOMXF vs SLNHBanner chart's image
Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V
Price$2.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.48%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization1.16B
Soluna Holdings
Price$2.75
Change-$0.19 (-6.46%)
Volume$17.27M
Capitalization89.71M
BOMXF vs SLNH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BOMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOMXF vs. SLNH commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOMXF is a Hold and SLNH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BOMXF: $2.07 vs. SLNH: $2.75)
Brand notoriety: BOMXF and SLNH are both not notable
BOMXF represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while SLNH is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOMXF: 4% vs. SLNH: 152%
Market capitalization -- BOMXF: $1.16B vs. SLNH: $89.71M
BOMXF [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $1.16B. SLNH’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $89.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $148.74B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.39B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOMXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLNH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BOMXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLNH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BOMXF is a better buy in the long-term than SLNH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOMXF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLNH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOMXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SLNH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLNH is a better buy in the short-term than BOMXF.

Price Growth

BOMXF (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -3.72% price change this week, while SLNH (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +154.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.61%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.63% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.96% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOMXF($1.16B) has a higher market cap than SLNH($89.7M). SLNH YTD gains are higher at: 30.952 vs. BOMXF (28.571). BOMXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.99B vs. SLNH (-44.67M). BOMXF has more cash in the bank: 3.42B vs. SLNH (9.88M). SLNH has less debt than BOMXF: SLNH (23.6M) vs BOMXF (423M). BOMXF has higher revenues than SLNH: BOMXF (4.18B) vs SLNH (27.9M).
BOMXFSLNHBOMXF / SLNH
Capitalization1.16B89.7M1,290%
EBITDA2.99B-44.67M-6,685%
Gain YTD28.57130.95292%
P/E Ratio12.50N/A-
Revenue4.18B27.9M14,993%
Total Cash3.42B9.88M34,622%
Total Debt423M23.6M1,792%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BOMXF vs SLNH: Fundamental Ratings
BOMXF
SLNH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1630
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98100
SMR RATING
1..100
38100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5334
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4210
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLNH's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as BOMXF (90). This means that SLNH’s stock grew similarly to BOMXF’s over the last 12 months.

BOMXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as SLNH (100). This means that BOMXF’s stock grew similarly to SLNH’s over the last 12 months.

BOMXF's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLNH (100). This means that BOMXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLNH’s over the last 12 months.

SLNH's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as BOMXF (53). This means that SLNH’s stock grew similarly to BOMXF’s over the last 12 months.

SLNH's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as BOMXF (42). This means that SLNH’s stock grew similarly to BOMXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOMXFSLNH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEXCF0.14N/A
+1.05%
NexTech3D.AI Corp.
BVNKF36.38N/A
N/A
Bavarian Nordic A/S
NBGIF14.29N/A
N/A
National Bank of Greece S.A.
MANVF0.02N/A
N/A
MANNING VENTURES INC.
GSCCF0.11-0.01
-7.48%
Ioneer Ltd.

BOMXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOMXF has been loosely correlated with BLVDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOMXF jumps, then BLVDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOMXF
1D Price
Change %
BOMXF100%
-0.48%
BLVDF - BOMXF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SLNH - BOMXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.46%
BTCWF - BOMXF
11%
Poorly correlated
-4.48%
CCORF - BOMXF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
BBKCF - BOMXF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
More

SLNH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLNH has been loosely correlated with BITF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLNH jumps, then BITF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLNH
1D Price
Change %
SLNH100%
-6.46%
BITF - SLNH
49%
Loosely correlated
-5.22%
HUT - SLNH
43%
Loosely correlated
-4.93%
HIVE - SLNH
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
COIN - SLNH
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
CIFR - SLNH
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
More