BOMXF
Price
$2.34
Change
+$0.04 (+1.74%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.27B
CCORF
Price
$7.76
Change
+$0.10 (+1.31%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
623.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOMXF vs CCORF

Header iconBOMXF vs CCORF Comparison
Open Charts BOMXF vs CCORFBanner chart's image
Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V
Price$2.34
Change+$0.04 (+1.74%)
Volume$2.24K
Capitalization1.27B
Canaccord Genuity Group
Price$7.76
Change+$0.10 (+1.31%)
Volume$8.46K
Capitalization623.61M
BOMXF vs CCORF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BOMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCORF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOMXF vs. CCORF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOMXF is a Hold and CCORF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BOMXF: $2.34 vs. CCORF: $7.76)
Brand notoriety: BOMXF and CCORF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOMXF: 15% vs. CCORF: 44%
Market capitalization -- BOMXF: $1.27B vs. CCORF: $623.61M
BOMXF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $1.27B. CCORF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $623.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOMXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCCORF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BOMXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CCORF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BOMXF is a better buy in the long-term than CCORF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOMXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCORF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOMXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CCORF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BOMXF is a better buy in the short-term than CCORF.

Price Growth

BOMXF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.68% price change this week, while CCORF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +2.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +24.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+24.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOMXF($1.27B) has a higher market cap than CCORF($624M). BOMXF has higher P/E ratio than CCORF: BOMXF (13.85) vs CCORF (10.94). BOMXF YTD gains are higher at: 45.255 vs. CCORF (10.463). BOMXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.61B vs. CCORF (88.1M). BOMXF has more cash in the bank: 3.43B vs. CCORF (1.72B). BOMXF has less debt than CCORF: BOMXF (259M) vs CCORF (434M). BOMXF has higher revenues than CCORF: BOMXF (4.12B) vs CCORF (1.51B).
BOMXFCCORFBOMXF / CCORF
Capitalization1.27B624M204%
EBITDA2.61B88.1M2,959%
Gain YTD45.25510.463433%
P/E Ratio13.8510.94127%
Revenue4.12B1.51B273%
Total Cash3.43B1.72B199%
Total Debt259M434M60%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BOMXF vs CCORF: Fundamental Ratings
BOMXF
CCORF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5865
SMR RATING
1..100
4191
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2662
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
501

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCORF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BOMXF (99). This means that CCORF’s stock grew significantly faster than BOMXF’s over the last 12 months.

BOMXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as CCORF (65). This means that BOMXF’s stock grew similarly to CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

BOMXF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCORF (91). This means that BOMXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

BOMXF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CCORF (42). This means that BOMXF’s stock grew similarly to CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

BOMXF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCORF (62). This means that BOMXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOMXFCCORF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
52%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCORF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVNCX23.030.19
+0.83%
Macquarie Global Growth Fund Class C
JGRTX137.980.91
+0.66%
Janus Henderson Enterprise S
BRUJX16.470.09
+0.55%
MFS Blended Research Value Equity R1
PJDQX18.220.10
+0.55%
PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend R6
OPGSX37.690.20
+0.53%
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals A

BOMXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOMXF has been loosely correlated with BLVDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOMXF jumps, then BLVDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOMXF
1D Price
Change %
BOMXF100%
N/A
BLVDF - BOMXF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SLNH - BOMXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+18.81%
BTCWF - BOMXF
11%
Poorly correlated
+9.74%
CCORF - BOMXF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
CESTY - BOMXF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CCORF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCORF and MQBKY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCORF and MQBKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCORF
1D Price
Change %
CCORF100%
+1.25%
MQBKY - CCORF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
DMGGF - CCORF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
NRSCF - CCORF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPPTF - CCORF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
XAUMF - CCORF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More