BOF
Price
$2.35
Change
+$0.09 (+3.98%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
7.76M
MUSLF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOF vs MUSLF

Header iconBOF vs MUSLF Comparison
Open Charts BOF vs MUSLFBanner chart's image
BranchOut Food
Price$2.35
Change+$0.09 (+3.98%)
Volume$58.7K
Capitalization7.76M
Promino Nutritional Sciences
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$2.48K
CapitalizationN/A
BOF vs MUSLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOF vs. MUSLF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOF is a Buy and MUSLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BOF: $2.35 vs. MUSLF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: BOF and MUSLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOF: 67% vs. MUSLF: 11%
Market capitalization -- BOF: $7.76M vs. MUSLF: $0
BOF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $7.76M. MUSLF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMUSLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MUSLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BOF is a better buy in the long-term than MUSLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUSLF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MUSLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BOF is a better buy in the short-term than MUSLF.

Price Growth

BOF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +19.29% price change this week, while MUSLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -18.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOF YTD gains are higher at: 35.838 vs. MUSLF (-19.094).
BOFMUSLFBOF / MUSLF
Capitalization7.77MN/A-
EBITDA-2.47MN/A-
Gain YTD35.838-19.094-188%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.37MN/A-
Total Cash1.01MN/A-
Total Debt376KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOFMUSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGA38.450.17
+0.44%
Magna International
KRT27.620.06
+0.22%
Karat Packaging
NMIH42.19-0.05
-0.12%
NMI Holdings
CLDI0.22-0.01
-2.31%
Calidi Biotherapeutics
BMEA1.81-0.18
-9.05%
Biomea Fusion

BOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BOF and CIADF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BOF and CIADF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOF
1D Price
Change %
BOF100%
+3.98%
CIADF - BOF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UVRBF - BOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFFY - BOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSY - BOF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
GIS - BOF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
More

MUSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MUSLF and KLG have been poorly correlated (+-1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MUSLF and KLG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUSLF
1D Price
Change %
MUSLF100%
-31.03%
KLG - MUSLF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
SRKE - MUSLF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOF - MUSLF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+3.98%
BRLS - MUSLF
-14%
Poorly correlated
-1.73%