BOCOF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.09 (-32.14%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
100.17M
MAGE
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOCOF vs MAGE

Header iconBOCOF vs MAGE Comparison
Open Charts BOCOF vs MAGEBanner chart's image
Bougainville Copper
Price$0.19
Change-$0.09 (-32.14%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization100.17M
Magellan Copper and Gold
Price$0.12
Change-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Volume$13.24K
Capitalization3.41M
BOCOF vs MAGE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BOCOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAGE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOCOF vs. MAGE commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOCOF is a Hold and MAGE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BOCOF: $0.19 vs. MAGE: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: BOCOF and MAGE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOCOF: 6% vs. MAGE: 135%
Market capitalization -- BOCOF: $100.17M vs. MAGE: $3.41M
BOCOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $100.17M. MAGE’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOCOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAGE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BOCOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAGE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAGE is a better buy in the long-term than BOCOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOCOF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAGE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOCOF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAGE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAGE is a better buy in the short-term than BOCOF.

Price Growth

BOCOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MAGE (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOCOF($100M) has a higher market cap than MAGE($3.41M). MAGE YTD gains are higher at: 36.941 vs. BOCOF (-38.710). MAGE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -531.64K vs. BOCOF (-9.36M). BOCOF has more cash in the bank: 9.47M vs. MAGE (2.14K). MAGE has less debt than BOCOF: MAGE (903K) vs BOCOF (972K).
BOCOFMAGEBOCOF / MAGE
Capitalization100M3.41M2,933%
EBITDA-9.36M-531.64K1,761%
Gain YTD-38.71036.941-105%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash9.47M2.14K441,465%
Total Debt972K903K108%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BOCOF vs MAGE: Fundamental Ratings
BOCOF
MAGE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
91100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9364
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAGE's Valuation (96) in the null industry is in the same range as BOCOF (98). This means that MAGE’s stock grew similarly to BOCOF’s over the last 12 months.

BOCOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGE (100). This means that BOCOF’s stock grew similarly to MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

BOCOF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGE (100). This means that BOCOF’s stock grew similarly to MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

MAGE's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as BOCOF (93). This means that MAGE’s stock grew similarly to BOCOF’s over the last 12 months.

MAGE's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BOCOF (100). This means that MAGE’s stock grew similarly to BOCOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOCOFMAGE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOCOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAGE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LCAGX15.880.15
+0.95%
Lord Abbett International Growth C
HILVX22.750.09
+0.40%
Harbor Large Cap Value Inv
JHDAX18.820.06
+0.32%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 2 A
TOCQX49.690.13
+0.26%
Tocqueville
MDFSX7.690.02
+0.26%
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S

BOCOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOCOF has been loosely correlated with OICT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOCOF jumps, then OICT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOCOF
1D Price
Change %
BOCOF100%
N/A
OICT - BOCOF
47%
Loosely correlated
+4.13%
SA - BOCOF
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.83%
PDIV - BOCOF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COSRF - BOCOF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPMLF - BOCOF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
More

MAGE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAGE and BDLNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAGE and BDLNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAGE
1D Price
Change %
MAGE100%
N/A
BDLNF - MAGE
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFRGF - MAGE
23%
Poorly correlated
+9.65%
ORLA - MAGE
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.49%
BOCOF - MAGE
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAKOF - MAGE
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.24%
More