BNT
Price
$66.58
Change
-$0.15 (-0.22%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
18.97B
61 days until earnings call
WDH
Price
$1.81
Change
-$0.01 (-0.55%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
654.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNT vs WDH

Header iconBNT vs WDH Comparison
Open Charts BNT vs WDHBanner chart's image
Brookfield Wealth Solutions
Price$66.58
Change-$0.15 (-0.22%)
Volume$35.49K
Capitalization18.97B
Waterdrop
Price$1.81
Change-$0.01 (-0.55%)
Volume$537.85K
Capitalization654.61M
BNT vs WDH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNT vs. WDH commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNT is a Hold and WDH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BNT: $66.58 vs. WDH: $1.81)
Brand notoriety: BNT and WDH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNT: 311% vs. WDH: 135%
Market capitalization -- BNT: $18.97B vs. WDH: $654.61M
BNT [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $18.97B. WDH’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $654.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $31.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWDH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WDH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNT is a better buy in the long-term than WDH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WDH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WDH is a better buy in the short-term than BNT.

Price Growth

BNT (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +1.14% price change this week, while WDH (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +5.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-1.00% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNT($19B) has a higher market cap than WDH($655M). BNT (10.83) and WDH (10.77) have similar P/E ratio . WDH YTD gains are higher at: 55.844 vs. BNT (16.303). BNT has more cash in the bank: 30.8B vs. WDH (1.94B). WDH has less debt than BNT: WDH (36.7M) vs BNT (4.71B). BNT has higher revenues than WDH: BNT (14.2B) vs WDH (2.82B).
BNTWDHBNT / WDH
Capitalization19B655M2,901%
EBITDAN/A208M-
Gain YTD16.30355.84429%
P/E Ratio10.8310.77100%
Revenue14.2B2.82B503%
Total Cash30.8B1.94B1,591%
Total Debt4.71B36.7M12,837%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNTWDH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JNUG121.135.93
+5.15%
Direxion Daily Jr Gld Mnrs Bull 2X ETF
FLEE34.220.14
+0.41%
Franklin FTSE Europe ETF
SHRY42.61N/A
+0.01%
First Trust Bloomberg Shld Yld ETF
AUGM33.40-0.01
-0.03%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Aug
LVHI34.37-0.12
-0.35%
Franklin Intl Low Volatility Hi Div ETF

BNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNT has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNT jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNT
1D Price
Change %
BNT100%
-0.22%
L - BNT
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
MKL - BNT
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.35%
CINF - BNT
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
AEG - BNT
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
KMPR - BNT
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
More

WDH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WDH and AEG have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WDH and AEG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDH
1D Price
Change %
WDH100%
-0.55%
AEG - WDH
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
BNT - WDH
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
AIG - WDH
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.08%
SLF - WDH
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
EQH - WDH
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
More