BNT
Price
$46.42
Change
+$0.16 (+0.35%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.51B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLF
Price
$57.84
Change
+$0.24 (+0.42%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.24B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNT vs SLF

Header iconBNT vs SLF Comparison
Open Charts BNT vs SLFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Wealth Solutions
Price$46.42
Change+$0.16 (+0.35%)
Volume$17.43K
Capitalization11.51B
Sun Life Financial
Price$57.84
Change+$0.24 (+0.42%)
Volume$2.86K
Capitalization32.24B
BNT vs SLF Comparison Chart in %
BNT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNT vs. SLF commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNT is a Hold and SLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BNT: $46.30 vs. SLF: $57.59)
Brand notoriety: BNT and SLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNT: 6% vs. SLF: 14%
Market capitalization -- BNT: $11.51B vs. SLF: $32.18B
BNT [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $11.51B. SLF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $32.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $32.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLF is a better buy in the long-term than BNT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNT is a better buy in the short-term than SLF.

Price Growth

BNT (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +0.46% price change this week, while SLF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -3.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

SLF is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-0.04% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLF($32.2B) has a higher market cap than BNT($11.5B). SLF has higher P/E ratio than BNT: SLF (15.27) vs BNT (11.34). BNT YTD gains are higher at: 21.920 vs. SLF (-2.949). BNT has less debt than SLF: BNT (4.71B) vs SLF (6.38B). SLF has higher revenues than BNT: SLF (33.4B) vs BNT (14.2B).
BNTSLFBNT / SLF
Capitalization11.5B32.2B36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.920-2.949-743%
P/E Ratio11.3415.2774%
Revenue14.2B33.4B43%
Total CashN/A25.4B-
Total Debt4.71B6.38B74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLF: Fundamental Ratings
SLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
29
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNTSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RILA11.640.06
+0.53%
Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF
FMAG34.350.05
+0.15%
Fidelity Magellan ETF
SJB15.43-0.03
-0.16%
ProShares Short High Yield
OIH292.15-0.86
-0.29%
VanEck Oil Services ETF
CSNR29.85-0.42
-1.37%
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Act ETF

BNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNT has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNT jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNT
1D Price
Change %
BNT100%
-0.04%
L - BNT
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
MKL - BNT
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
CINF - BNT
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
KMPR - BNT
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
AEG - BNT
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
More

SLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLF has been loosely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLF jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLF
1D Price
Change %
SLF100%
-0.21%
HIG - SLF
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
AEG - SLF
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
ORI - SLF
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
AVVIY - SLF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BNT - SLF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
More