BNT
Price
$64.27
Change
-$0.58 (-0.89%)
Updated
Aug 11, 12:21 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.73B
87 days until earnings call
PINXF
Price
$0.76
Change
-$0.08 (-9.52%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
47.71B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNT vs PINXF

Header iconBNT vs PINXF Comparison
Open Charts BNT vs PINXFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Wealth Solutions
Price$64.27
Change-$0.58 (-0.89%)
Volume$100
Capitalization15.73B
Peoples Insurance Company Group China
Price$0.76
Change-$0.08 (-9.52%)
Volume$800
Capitalization47.71B
BNT vs PINXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PINXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNT vs. PINXF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNT is a Hold and PINXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (BNT: $64.85 vs. PINXF: $0.76)
Brand notoriety: BNT and PINXF are both not notable
BNT represents the Multi-Line Insurance, while PINXF is part of the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNT: 120% vs. PINXF: 86%
Market capitalization -- BNT: $15.73B vs. PINXF: $47.71B
BNT [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $15.73B. PINXF’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $47.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $144.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $32.44B. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePINXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PINXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PINXF is a better buy in the long-term than BNT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PINXF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PINXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PINXF is a better buy in the short-term than BNT.

Price Growth

BNT (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -0.73% price change this week, while PINXF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.96%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+0.44% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.41% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PINXF($47.7B) has a higher market cap than BNT($15.7B). BNT has higher P/E ratio than PINXF: BNT (10.91) vs PINXF (6.00). PINXF YTD gains are higher at: 112.770 vs. BNT (13.281).
BNTPINXFBNT / PINXF
Capitalization15.7B47.7B33%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.281112.77012%
P/E Ratio10.916.00182%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt4.53BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PINXF: Fundamental Ratings
PINXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNTPINXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PINXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LAZR2.680.12
+4.69%
Luminar Technologies Inc
RDDT215.443.62
+1.71%
Reddit
LPL4.08N/A
N/A
LG Display Co Ltd
NISN4.04-0.01
-0.25%
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group Co Ltd
NXRT31.02-0.42
-1.34%
NexPoint Residential Trust

BNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNT has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNT jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNT
1D Price
Change %
BNT100%
N/A
L - BNT
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
MKL - BNT
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
AEG - BNT
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
CINF - BNT
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
KMPR - BNT
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
More

PINXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PINXF and LNDAF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PINXF and LNDAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PINXF
1D Price
Change %
PINXF100%
N/A
LNDAF - PINXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACIC - PINXF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-4.39%
BNT - PINXF
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROOT - PINXF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
TKOMF - PINXF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-7.39%
More