BNT
Price
$43.64
Change
-$3.28 (-6.99%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.35B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IGIC
Price
$23.46
Change
+$0.44 (+1.91%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.01B
104 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNT vs IGIC

Header iconBNT vs IGIC Comparison
Open Charts BNT vs IGICBanner chart's image
Brookfield Wealth Solutions
Price$43.64
Change-$3.28 (-6.99%)
Volume$600
Capitalization13.35B
International General Insurance Holdings
Price$23.46
Change+$0.44 (+1.91%)
Volume$75.75K
Capitalization1.01B
BNT vs IGIC Comparison Chart in %
BNT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IGIC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNT vs. IGIC commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNT is a Hold and IGIC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BNT: $46.92 vs. IGIC: $23.02)
Brand notoriety: BNT and IGIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNT: 36% vs. IGIC: 69%
Market capitalization -- BNT: $13.35B vs. IGIC: $1.01B
BNT [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $13.35B. IGIC’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $1.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $32.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIGIC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IGIC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IGIC is a better buy in the long-term than BNT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNT’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IGIC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IGIC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BNT and IGIC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BNT (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +2.09% price change this week, while IGIC (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +2.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

IGIC is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+0.83% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNT($13.3B) has a higher market cap than IGIC($1.01B). BNT has higher P/E ratio than IGIC: BNT (8.82) vs IGIC (8.25). BNT YTD gains are higher at: 23.553 vs. IGIC (0.682). IGIC has less debt than BNT: IGIC (3.07M) vs BNT (4.71B). BNT has higher revenues than IGIC: BNT (14.2B) vs IGIC (546M).
BNTIGICBNT / IGIC
Capitalization13.3B1.01B1,313%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.5530.6823,453%
P/E Ratio8.828.25107%
Revenue14.2B546M2,601%
Total CashN/A1.22B-
Total Debt4.71B3.07M153,253%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IGIC: Fundamental Ratings
IGIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9
SMR RATING
1..100
44
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNTIGIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IGIC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPOAX23.260.07
+0.30%
Macquarie Systematic Em Mkts Eq A
HSAFX9.900.01
+0.10%
Hussman Strategic Allocation
MXYKX5.31N/A
N/A
Empower T. Rowe Price Mid Cp Gr Instl
AIGGX18.18-0.05
-0.27%
Aristotle Growth Equity I-2
LGLAX56.43-0.22
-0.39%
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A

BNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNT has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNT jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNT
1D Price
Change %
BNT100%
+1.51%
L - BNT
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
MKL - BNT
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
CINF - BNT
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
KMPR - BNT
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
AEG - BNT
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
More

IGIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IGIC has been loosely correlated with AIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IGIC jumps, then AIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGIC
1D Price
Change %
IGIC100%
+0.79%
AIG - IGIC
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
ORI - IGIC
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
BNT - IGIC
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
FIHL - IGIC
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
ACGL - IGIC
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
More