Advertisement
BNT vs IFCZF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNT is a Buy and IFCZF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIFCZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- IFCZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BNT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFCZF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BNT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- IFCZF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BNT (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -0.28% price change this week, while IFCZF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -4.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.05%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.49%.
Reported Earning Dates
BNT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Multi-Line Insurance (-0.03% weekly)A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-2.07% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| BNT | IFCZF | BNT / IFCZF | |
| Capitalization | 11.5B | 34.8B | 33% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.236 | 7.465 | 298% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.34 | 16.39 | 69% |
| Revenue | 14.2B | 24.7B | 57% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 19.5B | - |
| Total Debt | 4.71B | 5.43B | 87% |
IFCZF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 9 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BNT | IFCZF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 31% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 29% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 33% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 29% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 67% | 9 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 34% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 52% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BLOK | 62.08 | 1.72 | +2.85% |
| Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | |||
| SPXM | 21.83 | 0.10 | +0.46% |
| Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | |||
| EHLS | 23.26 | 0.07 | +0.29% |
| Even Herd Long Short ETF | |||
| NOCT | 57.88 | 0.11 | +0.19% |
| Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buff ETF™ Oct | |||
| QMFE | 22.09 | 0.02 | +0.11% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Mod Buffr ETF - Feb | |||
BNT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNT has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNT jumps, then L could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNT | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| L - BNT | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| MKL - BNT | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| CINF - BNT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| KMPR - BNT | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| AEG - BNT | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
More | ||||
IFCZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFCZF has been loosely correlated with PLMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFCZF jumps, then PLMR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IFCZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFCZF | 100% | -0.84% | ||
| PLMR - IFCZF | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.35% | ||
| UFCS - IFCZF | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
| FRFHF - IFCZF | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
| MCY - IFCZF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
| BNT - IFCZF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||