It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BNS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BNS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
BNS (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.54% price change this week, while SMFG (@Major Banks) price change was +3.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.20%.
BNS is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
SMFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
BNS | SMFG | BNS / SMFG | |
Capitalization | 63.2B | 74.8B | 84% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 10.516 | 49.741 | 21% |
P/E Ratio | 11.14 | 13.83 | 81% |
Revenue | 32.2B | 3.98T | 1% |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 306B | 32.98T | 1% |
BNS | SMFG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 2 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SMFG's Valuation (52) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNS (63). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BNS’s over the last 12 months.
SMFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BNS (100). This means that SMFG’s stock grew significantly faster than BNS’s over the last 12 months.
SMFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNS (2). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BNS’s over the last 12 months.
SMFG's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNS (46). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BNS’s over the last 12 months.
BNS's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (50). This means that BNS’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.
BNS | SMFG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago58% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago48% | 1 day ago48% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 1 day ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 1 day ago62% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 1 day ago59% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago43% | 1 day ago60% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago0% | 5 days ago57% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago53% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago50% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago33% | 1 day ago60% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNS has been loosely correlated with CM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNS jumps, then CM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFG has been closely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMFG jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SMFG | 100% | +2.88% | ||
MUFG - SMFG | 89% Closely correlated | +4.96% | ||
CMWAY - SMFG | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
UBS - SMFG | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
WFC - SMFG | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
BNS - SMFG | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.45% | ||
More |