BNS
Price
$50.50
Change
-$0.63 (-1.23%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
63.25B
2 days until earnings call
SMFG
Price
$15.29
Change
-$0.34 (-2.18%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
74.81B
80 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BNS vs SMFG

Header iconBNS vs SMFG Comparison
Open Charts BNS vs SMFGBanner chart's image
Bank of Nova Scotia
Price$50.50
Change-$0.63 (-1.23%)
Volume$1.51M
Capitalization63.25B
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$15.29
Change-$0.34 (-2.18%)
Volume$992.05K
Capitalization74.81B
BNS vs SMFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNS vs. SMFG commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNS is a StrongBuy and SMFG is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BNS: $51.03 vs. SMFG: $15.59)
Brand notoriety: BNS and SMFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNS: 69% vs. SMFG: 106%
Market capitalization -- BNS: $63.25B vs. SMFG: $74.81B
BNS [@Major Banks] is valued at $63.25B. SMFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $74.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMFG is a better buy in the long-term than BNS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SMFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNS is a better buy in the short-term than SMFG.

Price Growth

BNS (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.12% price change this week, while SMFG (@Major Banks) price change was +6.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNS is expected to report earnings on May 27, 2025.

SMFG is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.13% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFG($74.8B) has a higher market cap than BNS($63.2B). SMFG has higher P/E ratio than BNS: SMFG (13.83) vs BNS (11.14). SMFG YTD gains are higher at: 7.591 vs. BNS (-5.007). BNS has less debt than SMFG: BNS (306B) vs SMFG (32.98T). SMFG has higher revenues than BNS: SMFG (3.98T) vs BNS (32.2B).
BNSSMFGBNS / SMFG
Capitalization63.2B74.8B84%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.0077.591-66%
P/E Ratio11.1413.8381%
Revenue32.2B3.98T1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt306B32.98T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNS vs SMFG: Fundamental Ratings
BNS
SMFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
567
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1006
SMR RATING
1..100
31
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4166
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMFG's Valuation (48) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNS (54). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BNS’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BNS (100). This means that SMFG’s stock grew significantly faster than BNS’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNS (3). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BNS’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNS (56). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BNS’s over the last 12 months.

BNS's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (66). This means that BNS’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNSSMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

BNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNS has been loosely correlated with CM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNS jumps, then CM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNS
1D Price
Change %
BNS100%
-0.39%
CM - BNS
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
RY - BNS
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
BMO - BNS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
BBVA - BNS
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.82%
SMFG - BNS
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.04%
More

SMFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFG has been closely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMFG jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFG
1D Price
Change %
SMFG100%
+3.04%
MUFG - SMFG
88%
Closely correlated
+3.98%
C - SMFG
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
UBS - SMFG
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
CMWAY - SMFG
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
WFC - SMFG
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
More