BNS
Price
$53.81
Change
+$0.24 (+0.45%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
18 days until earnings call
SMFG
Price
$14.29
Change
+$0.40 (+2.88%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
76 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BNS vs SMFG

Header iconBNS vs SMFG Comparison
Open Charts BNS vs SMFGBanner chart's image
Bank of Nova Scotia
Price$53.81
Change+$0.24 (+0.45%)
Volume$987.84K
CapitalizationN/A
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$14.29
Change+$0.40 (+2.88%)
Volume$1.33M
CapitalizationN/A
BNS vs SMFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNS vs. SMFG commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNS is a Sell and SMFG is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (BNS: $53.81 vs. SMFG: $14.29)
Brand notoriety: BNS and SMFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNS: 61% vs. SMFG: 108%
Market capitalization -- BNS: $63.25B vs. SMFG: $74.81B
BNS [@Major Banks] is valued at $63.25B. SMFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $74.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BNS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMFG is a better buy in the long-term than BNS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SMFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMFG is a better buy in the short-term than BNS.

Price Growth

BNS (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.54% price change this week, while SMFG (@Major Banks) price change was +3.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNS is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

SMFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-1.38% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFG($74.8B) has a higher market cap than BNS($63.2B). SMFG has higher P/E ratio than BNS: SMFG (13.83) vs BNS (11.14). SMFG YTD gains are higher at: 49.741 vs. BNS (10.516). BNS has less debt than SMFG: BNS (306B) vs SMFG (32.98T). SMFG has higher revenues than BNS: SMFG (3.98T) vs BNS (32.2B).
BNSSMFGBNS / SMFG
Capitalization63.2B74.8B84%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.51649.74121%
P/E Ratio11.1413.8381%
Revenue32.2B3.98T1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt306B32.98T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNS vs SMFG: Fundamental Ratings
BNS
SMFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1726
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1008
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2950
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMFG's Valuation (52) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNS (63). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BNS’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BNS (100). This means that SMFG’s stock grew significantly faster than BNS’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNS (2). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BNS’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNS (46). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BNS’s over the last 12 months.

BNS's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (50). This means that BNS’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNSSMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
0%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

BNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNS has been loosely correlated with CM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNS jumps, then CM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNS
1D Price
Change %
BNS100%
+0.45%
CM - BNS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
RY - BNS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
BMO - BNS
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
BCS - BNS
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
ING - BNS
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
More

SMFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFG has been closely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMFG jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFG
1D Price
Change %
SMFG100%
+2.88%
MUFG - SMFG
89%
Closely correlated
+4.96%
CMWAY - SMFG
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
UBS - SMFG
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
WFC - SMFG
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
BNS - SMFG
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
More