BNS
Price
$64.39
Change
+$0.02 (+0.03%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
80.24B
66 days until earnings call
SAN
Price
$10.38
Change
+$0.16 (+1.57%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
154.06B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNS vs SAN

Header iconBNS vs SAN Comparison
Open Charts BNS vs SANBanner chart's image
Bank of Nova Scotia
Price$64.39
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
Volume$1.19M
Capitalization80.24B
Banco Santander SA
Price$10.38
Change+$0.16 (+1.57%)
Volume$2.61M
Capitalization154.06B
BNS vs SAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNS vs. SAN commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNS is a Buy and SAN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BNS: $64.39 vs. SAN: $10.38)
Brand notoriety: BNS and SAN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNS: 70% vs. SAN: 61%
Market capitalization -- BNS: $80.24B vs. SAN: $154.06B
BNS [@Major Banks] is valued at $80.24B. SAN’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $154.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $869.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $136.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BNS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SAN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAN is a better buy in the long-term than BNS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAN is a better buy in the short-term than BNS.

Price Growth

BNS (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.83% price change this week, while SAN (@Major Banks) price change was +1.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +130.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNS is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2025.

SAN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.79% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAN($154B) has a higher market cap than BNS($80.2B). BNS has higher P/E ratio than SAN: BNS (17.11) vs SAN (10.81). SAN YTD gains are higher at: 135.238 vs. BNS (19.862). BNS (302B) and SAN (312B) have identical debt. SAN has higher revenues than BNS: SAN (63.6B) vs BNS (36B).
BNSSANBNS / SAN
Capitalization80.2B154B52%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.862135.23815%
P/E Ratio17.1110.81158%
Revenue36B63.6B57%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt302B312B97%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNS vs SAN: Fundamental Ratings
BNS
SAN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8022
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
613
SMR RATING
1..100
32
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1911
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNS's Valuation (77) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SAN (82). This means that BNS’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNS (61). This means that SAN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNS’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNS (3). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BNS’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNS (44). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BNS’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNS (19). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BNS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNSSAN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MODG9.470.27
+2.93%
Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp
PSN81.461.76
+2.21%
Parsons Corp
BRFH3.650.01
+0.27%
Barfresh Food Group
MBAVU11.20N/A
N/A
M3-Brigade Acquisition V Corp
BBCP7.16N/A
N/A
Concrete Pumping Holdings

BNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNS has been loosely correlated with CM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNS jumps, then CM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNS
1D Price
Change %
BNS100%
+0.03%
CM - BNS
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
BMO - BNS
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
RY - BNS
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
ING - BNS
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
SAN - BNS
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
More

SAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAN has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAN jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAN
1D Price
Change %
SAN100%
+1.57%
BBVA - SAN
86%
Closely correlated
+2.45%
ING - SAN
74%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
BCS - SAN
66%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
HSBC - SAN
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
MUFG - SAN
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
More