BNS
Price
$67.27
Change
-$0.56 (-0.83%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
84.21B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CM
Price
$86.19
Change
-$0.85 (-0.98%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
80.83B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNS vs CM

Header iconBNS vs CM Comparison
Open Charts BNS vs CMBanner chart's image
Bank of Nova Scotia
Price$67.27
Change-$0.56 (-0.83%)
Volume$23.15K
Capitalization84.21B
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
Price$86.19
Change-$0.85 (-0.98%)
Volume$23.59K
Capitalization80.83B
BNS vs CM Comparison Chart in %
BNS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNS vs. CM commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNS is a Buy and CM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BNS: $67.83 vs. CM: $87.03)
Brand notoriety: BNS and CM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNS: 77% vs. CM: 84%
Market capitalization -- BNS: $84.21B vs. CM: $80.83B
BNS [@Major Banks] is valued at $84.21B. CM’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $80.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $872.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $142.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BNS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CM is a better buy in the long-term than BNS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CM is a better buy in the short-term than BNS.

Price Growth

BNS (@Major Banks) experienced а +3.56% price change this week, while CM (@Major Banks) price change was +4.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNS is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2025.

CM is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.91% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNS($84.2B) and CM($80.8B) have the same market capitalization . BNS has higher P/E ratio than CM: BNS (18.19) vs CM (14.76). CM YTD gains are higher at: 37.640 vs. BNS (26.266). CM has less debt than BNS: CM (224B) vs BNS (302B). BNS has higher revenues than CM: BNS (36B) vs CM (28.1B).
BNSCMBNS / CM
Capitalization84.2B80.8B104%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.26637.64070%
P/E Ratio18.1914.76123%
Revenue36B28.1B128%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt302B224B135%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNS vs CM: Fundamental Ratings
BNS
CM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1723
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5531
SMR RATING
1..100
34
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1429
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNS's Valuation (81) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CM (87) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that BNS’s stock grew similarly to CM’s over the last 12 months.

CM's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as BNS (55) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CM’s stock grew similarly to BNS’s over the last 12 months.

BNS's SMR Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CM (4) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that BNS’s stock grew similarly to CM’s over the last 12 months.

CM's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as BNS (44) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CM’s stock grew similarly to BNS’s over the last 12 months.

BNS's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CM (29) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that BNS’s stock grew similarly to CM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNSCM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOXQ55.750.80
+1.46%
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
YJUN25.320.02
+0.09%
FT Vest Intl Eq Mod Bf ETF June
HDV121.720.07
+0.06%
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
DIEM33.710.02
+0.06%
Franklin Emerging Mkt Core Div TltIdxETF
PRXG36.94N/A
N/A
Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF

BNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNS has been closely correlated with BMO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BNS jumps, then BMO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNS
1D Price
Change %
BNS100%
+1.60%
BMO - BNS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
CM - BNS
76%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
EWBC - BNS
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
RY - BNS
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
NWG - BNS
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
More

CM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CM has been closely correlated with RY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CM jumps, then RY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CM
1D Price
Change %
CM100%
+1.52%
RY - CM
71%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
BNS - CM
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
EWBC - CM
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
BMO - CM
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
NWG - CM
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
More