BNPQF
Price
$106.33
Change
+$17.55 (+19.77%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
120.06B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SCGLY
Price
$18.25
Change
+$5.64 (+44.73%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
66.84B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNPQF vs SCGLY

Header iconBNPQF vs SCGLY Comparison
Open Charts BNPQF vs SCGLYBanner chart's image
BNP Paribas
Price$106.33
Change+$17.55 (+19.77%)
Volume$21.3K
Capitalization120.06B
Societe Generale
Price$18.25
Change+$5.64 (+44.73%)
Volume$368.01K
Capitalization66.84B
BNPQF vs SCGLY Comparison Chart in %
BNPQF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCGLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNPQF vs. SCGLY commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNPQF is a Hold and SCGLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BNPQF: $106.33 vs. SCGLY: $18.25)
Brand notoriety: BNPQF and SCGLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNPQF: 1389% vs. SCGLY: 77%
Market capitalization -- BNPQF: $120.06B vs. SCGLY: $66.84B
BNPQF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $120.06B. SCGLY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $66.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNPQF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCGLY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BNPQF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCGLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNPQF is a better buy in the long-term than SCGLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNPQF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCGLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNPQF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCGLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNPQF is a better buy in the short-term than SCGLY.

Price Growth

BNPQF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.88% price change this week, while SCGLY (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCGLY is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.10% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNPQF($120B) has a higher market cap than SCGLY($66.8B). SCGLY has higher P/E ratio than BNPQF: SCGLY (13.80) vs BNPQF (9.43). SCGLY YTD gains are higher at: 13.003 vs. BNPQF (11.154). SCGLY has less debt than BNPQF: SCGLY (169B) vs BNPQF (350B). BNPQF has higher revenues than SCGLY: BNPQF (67.3B) vs SCGLY (53.2B).
BNPQFSCGLYBNPQF / SCGLY
Capitalization120B66.8B180%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.15413.00386%
P/E Ratio9.4313.8068%
Revenue67.3B53.2B127%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt350B169B207%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNPQF vs SCGLY: Fundamental Ratings
BNPQF
SCGLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
223
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
385
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2522
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNPQF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGLY (70). This means that BNPQF’s stock grew similarly to SCGLY’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNPQF (38). This means that SCGLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNPQF’s over the last 12 months.

BNPQF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGLY (6). This means that BNPQF’s stock grew similarly to SCGLY’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQF (40). This means that SCGLY’s stock grew similarly to BNPQF’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLY's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQF (25). This means that SCGLY’s stock grew similarly to BNPQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNPQFSCGLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNPQF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCGLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WNC11.240.34
+3.12%
Wabash National Corp
NYT72.21-1.49
-2.02%
New York Times Co
DCGO0.72-0.06
-7.59%
DocGo
BRZE18.93-1.81
-8.73%
Braze
LRHC2.01-0.44
-17.96%
La Rosa Holdings Corp.

BNPQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNPQF has been loosely correlated with BNPQY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNPQF jumps, then BNPQY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNPQF
1D Price
Change %
BNPQF100%
-0.12%
BNPQY - BNPQF
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
SCGLY - BNPQF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
CRARY - BNPQF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
KBCSY - BNPQF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
UNCRY - BNPQF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
More

SCGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCGLY has been closely correlated with BNPQY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCGLY jumps, then BNPQY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCGLY
1D Price
Change %
SCGLY100%
+0.27%
BNPQY - SCGLY
72%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
ISNPY - SCGLY
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
CRARY - SCGLY
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
KBCSY - SCGLY
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
UNCRY - SCGLY
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
More