BNPQF
Price
$81.25
Change
+$2.37 (+3.00%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
78.9B
MDIBY
Price
$17.96
Change
+$0.41 (+2.34%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
11.23B
Ad is loading...

BNPQF vs MDIBY

Header iconBNPQF vs MDIBY Comparison
Open Charts BNPQF vs MDIBYBanner chart's image
BNP Paribas
Price$81.25
Change+$2.37 (+3.00%)
Volume$481
Capitalization78.9B
MedioBanca SpA
Price$17.96
Change+$0.41 (+2.34%)
Volume$6.72K
Capitalization11.23B
BNPQF vs MDIBY Comparison Chart
Loading...
MDIBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNPQF vs. MDIBY commentary
Apr 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNPQF is a Hold and MDIBY is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2025
Stock price -- (BNPQF: $81.25 vs. MDIBY: $17.96)
Brand notoriety: BNPQF and MDIBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNPQF: 1% vs. MDIBY: 58%
Market capitalization -- BNPQF: $78.9B vs. MDIBY: $11.23B
BNPQF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $78.9B. MDIBY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $11.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNPQF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMDIBY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BNPQF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MDIBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BNPQF and MDIBY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MDIBY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MDIBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BNPQF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.24% price change this week, while MDIBY (@Regional Banks) price change was +9.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNPQF($78.9B) has a higher market cap than MDIBY($11.2B). MDIBY has higher P/E ratio than BNPQF: MDIBY (9.84) vs BNPQF (8.33). BNPQF YTD gains are higher at: 35.079 vs. MDIBY (25.947). MDIBY has less debt than BNPQF: MDIBY (22.3B) vs BNPQF (341B). BNPQF has higher revenues than MDIBY: BNPQF (60.4B) vs MDIBY (2.85B).
BNPQFMDIBYBNPQF / MDIBY
Capitalization78.9B11.2B704%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD35.07925.947135%
P/E Ratio8.339.8485%
Revenue60.4B2.85B2,119%
Total CashN/A117M-
Total Debt341B22.3B1,529%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNPQF vs MDIBY: Fundamental Ratings
BNPQF
MDIBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5092
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
325
SMR RATING
1..100
310
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7950
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNPQF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDIBY (76). This means that BNPQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDIBY’s over the last 12 months.

MDIBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQF (32). This means that MDIBY’s stock grew similarly to BNPQF’s over the last 12 months.

BNPQF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MDIBY (10). This means that BNPQF’s stock grew similarly to MDIBY’s over the last 12 months.

BNPQF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as MDIBY (45). This means that BNPQF’s stock grew similarly to MDIBY’s over the last 12 months.

MDIBY's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQF (79). This means that MDIBY’s stock grew similarly to BNPQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MDIBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MDIBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
SPY526.410.75
+0.14%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X85174.305000110.898440
+0.13%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

BNPQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNPQF has been loosely correlated with BNPQY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNPQF jumps, then BNPQY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNPQF
1D Price
Change %
BNPQF100%
+3.01%
BNPQY - BNPQF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
SCGLY - BNPQF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
KBCSY - BNPQF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
CRARY - BNPQF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
MDIBY - BNPQF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
More

MDIBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDIBY has been loosely correlated with ISNPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDIBY jumps, then ISNPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDIBY
1D Price
Change %
MDIBY100%
+2.34%
ISNPY - MDIBY
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
BNPQY - MDIBY
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
SCGLY - MDIBY
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
UNCRY - MDIBY
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
CRARY - MDIBY
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
More