BNNLF
Price
$1.93
Change
-$0.03 (-1.53%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
182.39M
FCUUF
Price
$0.50
Change
-$0.01 (-1.96%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
343.18M
54 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BNNLF vs FCUUF

Header iconBNNLF vs FCUUF Comparison
Open Charts BNNLF vs FCUUFBanner chart's image
BANNERMAN ENERGY
Price$1.93
Change-$0.03 (-1.53%)
Volume$26.95K
Capitalization182.39M
Fission Uranium
Price$0.50
Change-$0.01 (-1.96%)
Volume$276.5K
Capitalization343.18M
BNNLF vs FCUUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BNNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCUUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNNLF vs. FCUUF commentary
Jan 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNNLF is a Hold and FCUUF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 22, 2025
Stock price -- (BNNLF: $1.93 vs. FCUUF: $0.50)
Brand notoriety: BNNLF and FCUUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNNLF: 66% vs. FCUUF: 49%
Market capitalization -- BNNLF: $182.39M vs. FCUUF: $343.18M
BNNLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $182.39M. FCUUF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $343.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNNLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFCUUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BNNLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FCUUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BNNLF and FCUUF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNNLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCUUF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNNLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FCUUF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNNLF is a better buy in the short-term than FCUUF.

Price Growth

BNNLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.41% price change this week, while FCUUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCUUF is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.41% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCUUF($343M) has a higher market cap than BNNLF($182M). BNNLF YTD gains are higher at: 5.344 vs. FCUUF (0.000). BNNLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.56M vs. FCUUF (-5.71M). FCUUF has more cash in the bank: 45.6M vs. BNNLF (4.17M). BNNLF has less debt than FCUUF: BNNLF (46K) vs FCUUF (266K).
BNNLFFCUUFBNNLF / FCUUF
Capitalization182M343M53%
EBITDA-2.56M-5.71M45%
Gain YTD5.3440.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash4.17M45.6M9%
Total Debt46K266K17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNNLF vs FCUUF: Fundamental Ratings
BNNLF
FCUUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8221
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4252
SMR RATING
1..100
9190
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5465
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCUUF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BNNLF (58). This means that FCUUF’s stock grew similarly to BNNLF’s over the last 12 months.

BNNLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FCUUF (52). This means that BNNLF’s stock grew similarly to FCUUF’s over the last 12 months.

FCUUF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as BNNLF (91). This means that FCUUF’s stock grew similarly to BNNLF’s over the last 12 months.

BNNLF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as FCUUF (65). This means that BNNLF’s stock grew similarly to FCUUF’s over the last 12 months.

BNNLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FCUUF (100). This means that BNNLF’s stock grew similarly to FCUUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNNLFFCUUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
88%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
88%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BNNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCUUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

BNNLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNNLF has been loosely correlated with DYLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNNLF jumps, then DYLLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNNLF
1D Price
Change %
BNNLF100%
-1.64%
DYLLF - BNNLF
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
FCUUF - BNNLF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SRUUF - BNNLF
38%
Loosely correlated
+3.14%
LMRXF - BNNLF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
ISENF - BNNLF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
More

FCUUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCUUF has been loosely correlated with ISENF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCUUF jumps, then ISENF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCUUF
1D Price
Change %
FCUUF100%
N/A
ISENF - FCUUF
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
SRUUF - FCUUF
56%
Loosely correlated
+3.14%
MGAFF - FCUUF
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.69%
SYHBF - FCUUF
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
LMRXF - FCUUF
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
More